Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp417762ybe; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:15:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzXYok/biUydfeuC7uapoV7JzdhZ09Vz9tg2u5jsm37FwGNWG1cHyAfyXkgP0FNk5Vx6uha X-Received: by 2002:aa7:db12:: with SMTP id t18mr13892404eds.156.1568862918842; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:15:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568862918; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rffnhFx28I22k3nIsGdyb6c5EvlNhMf8PLAU1vHKthwDhz7DfBWTZ/f9G51+KXRkDV 45d7Tywtv1Pw8HCKauXVT5G9j6iSDdguLk4nfM+9rj5jy8EqhdaRY2fHm8d/pwWszMNa GwotkbWSAdBtSasrbYWD+/7aG5bzeM0U9yWWwTCNB4KR5NFwjoolY9qRjhG9oD32mZD7 V6vUW73gWZ755AgYn9f92qhrISFKzZs62/aTplM9pe2RJNBMSIc4+UQ4XU6EDe132Eq7 iRtOj6pZsLHaM63lOiexanGEy2AtPoE+YTy1NfARebTZYHz7ReCebmdr4646pP7AdkYF psog== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:user-agent:organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc :to:from:subject; bh=hA4wXS/yTr0A0mkWVxtKKagpCTZw90CK29S3zjmbuJI=; b=Ek6zMDpTXyo58XprB3kfTSbN6G66JyG19yRvu90ttt3yIGLsaZSavuwrGKtdIqhyEd 1vrINMBgl8LFlMB9KxScemokMM7SCKKJ9QAC7YVVktF8F0b0SEsn+eT6Sbvd/EzAOPBY vrmj/btUf+PxFoq9XnhXh3bT+dHSCVvbj+NR/M0s79LX4cDUc7vaCJq77dKMXJ5O/sXY XOascwENhsX/RQdCZAEFLClwAzGxCqDA8NE8nmOP6uNi56CgQpmy1gFL+tZ68WNGH0MI rgss+oeppxTjlIXN/L/olHNbPVyv4LGdhFtnIbMlXbSSWONA4dnIHe1OYo2NxsxbTFHi h2tQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l22si4348428edq.174.2019.09.18.20.14.55; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731450AbfISBTn (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 21:19:43 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:15338 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727114AbfISBTn (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 21:19:43 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8J1CrVH075685 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 21:19:41 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v3vdqwnp3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 21:19:41 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 02:19:39 +0100 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 19 Sep 2019 02:19:34 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8J1J7Z017957334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:19:07 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C728342042; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:19:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F34F42041; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:19:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:19:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsilva.ozlabs.ibm.com (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C90FA01EB; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:19:30 +1000 (AEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ocxl: Add functions to map/unmap LPC memory From: "Alastair D'Silva" To: Frederic Barrat Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Andrew Donnellan , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater , Allison Randal , Vaibhav Jain , Mahesh Salgaonkar , Anju T Sudhakar , David Gibson , Nicholas Piggin , Masahiro Yamada , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:19:30 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <20190917014307.30485-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> <20190917014307.30485-5-alastair@au1.ibm.com> Organization: IBM Australia Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 (3.32.4-1.fc30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19091901-0028-0000-0000-0000039FC043 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19091901-0029-0000-0000-00002461C571 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-18_10:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=965 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909190009 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 16:03 +0200, Frederic Barrat wrote: > > Le 17/09/2019 à 03:43, Alastair D'Silva a écrit : > > From: Alastair D'Silva > > > > Add functions to map/unmap LPC memory > > > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva > > --- > > drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c | 4 +++ > > drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c | 50 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c | 4 +-- > > drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h | 10 +++++-- > > include/misc/ocxl.h | 18 +++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c > > b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c > > index c8e19bfb5ef9..fb0c3b6f8312 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c > > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c > > @@ -568,6 +568,10 @@ static int read_afu_lpc_memory_info(struct > > pci_dev *dev, > > afu->special_purpose_mem_size = > > total_mem_size - lpc_mem_size; > > } > > + > > + dev_info(&dev->dev, "Probed LPC memory of %#llx bytes and > > special purpose memory of %#llx bytes\n", > > + afu->lpc_mem_size, afu->special_purpose_mem_size); > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c > > index fdfe4e0a34e1..eb24bb9d655f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c > > @@ -210,6 +210,55 @@ static void unmap_mmio_areas(struct ocxl_afu > > *afu) > > release_fn_bar(afu->fn, afu->config.global_mmio_bar); > > } > > > > +int ocxl_map_lpc_mem(struct ocxl_afu *afu) > > +{ > > + struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(afu->fn->dev.parent); > > + > > + if ((afu->config.lpc_mem_size + afu- > > >config.special_purpose_mem_size) == 0) > > + return 0; > > + > > + afu->lpc_base_addr = ocxl_link_lpc_online(afu->fn->link, dev); > > + if (afu->lpc_base_addr == 0) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (afu->config.lpc_mem_size) { > > + afu->lpc_res.start = afu->lpc_base_addr + afu- > > >config.lpc_mem_offset; > > + afu->lpc_res.end = afu->lpc_res.start + afu- > > >config.lpc_mem_size - 1; > > + } > > + > > + if (afu->config.special_purpose_mem_size) { > > + afu->special_purpose_res.start = afu->lpc_base_addr + > > + afu- > > >config.special_purpose_mem_offset; > > + afu->special_purpose_res.end = afu- > > >special_purpose_res.start + > > + afu- > > >config.special_purpose_mem_size - 1; > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ocxl_map_lpc_mem); > > + > > +struct resource *ocxl_afu_lpc_mem(struct ocxl_afu *afu) > > +{ > > + return &afu->lpc_res; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ocxl_afu_lpc_mem); > > + > > +static void unmap_lpc_mem(struct ocxl_afu *afu) > > +{ > > + struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(afu->fn->dev.parent); > > + > > + if (afu->lpc_res.start || afu->special_purpose_res.start) { > > + void *link = afu->fn->link; > > + > > + ocxl_link_lpc_offline(link, dev); > > + > > + afu->lpc_res.start = 0; > > + afu->lpc_res.end = 0; > > + afu->special_purpose_res.start = 0; > > + afu->special_purpose_res.end = 0; > > + } > > +} > > + > > static int configure_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu, u8 afu_idx, struct > > pci_dev *dev) > > { > > int rc; > > @@ -250,6 +299,7 @@ static int configure_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu, > > u8 afu_idx, struct pci_dev *dev) > > > > static void deconfigure_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu) > > { > > + unmap_lpc_mem(afu); > > unmap_mmio_areas(afu); > > reclaim_afu_pasid(afu); > > reclaim_afu_actag(afu); > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c > > index 2874811a4398..9e303a5f4d85 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c > > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c > > @@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ int ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(void *link_handle, > > u64 size) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem); > > > > -u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev) > > +u64 ocxl_link_lpc_online(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev) > > { > > struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; > > > > @@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct > > pci_dev *pdev) > > return link->lpc_mem; > > } > > > > -void ocxl_link_lpc_release(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev > > *pdev) > > +void ocxl_link_lpc_offline(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev > > *pdev) > > Could we avoid the renaming by squashing it with the previous patch? > Yup, good catch. > > > { > > struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > index db2647a90fc8..5656a4aab5b7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > @@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ struct ocxl_afu { > > void __iomem *global_mmio_ptr; > > u64 pp_mmio_start; > > void *private; > > + u64 lpc_base_addr; /* Covers both LPC & special purpose memory > > */ > > + struct bin_attribute attr_global_mmio; > > + struct bin_attribute attr_lpc_mem; > > + struct resource lpc_res; > > + struct bin_attribute attr_special_purpose_mem; > > + struct resource special_purpose_res; > > }; > > > > enum ocxl_context_status { > > @@ -170,7 +176,7 @@ extern u64 ocxl_link_get_lpc_mem_sz(void > > *link_handle); > > * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle > > * @pdev: A device that is on the link > > */ > > -u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev); > > +u64 ocxl_link_lpc_online(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev); > > > > /** > > * Release the LPC memory device for an OpenCAPI device > > @@ -181,6 +187,6 @@ u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct > > pci_dev *pdev); > > * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle > > * @pdev: A device that is on the link > > */ > > -void ocxl_link_lpc_release(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev > > *pdev); > > +void ocxl_link_lpc_offline(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev > > *pdev); > > > > #endif /* _OCXL_INTERNAL_H_ */ > > diff --git a/include/misc/ocxl.h b/include/misc/ocxl.h > > index 06dd5839e438..a1897737908d 100644 > > --- a/include/misc/ocxl.h > > +++ b/include/misc/ocxl.h > > @@ -212,6 +212,24 @@ int ocxl_irq_set_handler(struct ocxl_context > > *ctx, int irq_id, > > > > // AFU Metadata > > > > +/** > > + * Map the LPC system & special purpose memory for an AFU > > + * > > + * Do not call this during device discovery, as there may me > > multiple > > + * devices on a link, and the memory is mapped for the whole link, > > not > > + * just one device. It should only be called after all devices > > have > > + * registered their memory on the link. > > + * > > + * afu: The AFU that has the LPC memory to map > > + */ > > +extern int ocxl_map_lpc_mem(struct ocxl_afu *afu); > > + > > +/** > > + * Get the physical address range of LPC memory for an AFU > > + * afu: The AFU associated with the LPC memory > > + */ > > +extern struct resource *ocxl_afu_lpc_mem(struct ocxl_afu *afu); > > + > > /** > > * Get a pointer to the config for an AFU > > * > > -- Alastair D'Silva Open Source Developer Linux Technology Centre, IBM Australia mob: 0423 762 819