Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH] block: t10-pi: fix -Wswitch warning
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 15:57:19 +0200
Message-Id: <20190919135725.1287963-1-arnd@arndb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Changing the switch() statement to symbolic constants made
the compiler (at least clang-9, did not check gcc) notice that
there is one enum value that is not handled here:

block/t10-pi.c:62:11: error: enumeration value 'T10_PI_TYPE0_PROTECTION' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]

Add another case for the missing value and do nothing there
based on the assumption that the code was working correctly
already.

Fixes: 9b2061b1a262 ("block: use symbolic constants for t10_pi type")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 block/t10-pi.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/t10-pi.c b/block/t10-pi.c
index 0c0120a672f9..055fac923946 100644
--- a/block/t10-pi.c
+++ b/block/t10-pi.c
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ static blk_status_t t10_pi_verify(struct blk_integrity_iter *iter,
 		__be16 csum;
 
 		switch (type) {
+		case T10_PI_TYPE0_PROTECTION:
+			break;
 		case T10_PI_TYPE1_PROTECTION:
 		case T10_PI_TYPE2_PROTECTION:
 			if (pi->app_tag == T10_PI_APP_ESCAPE)
-- 
2.20.0