Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:01:39 +0200
From:   Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To:     Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc:     Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
        will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, joro@8bytes.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for Substream IDs
Message-ID: <20190919150139.GC1013538@lophozonia>
References: <20190610184714.6786-1-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
 <20190610184714.6786-5-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
 <af286d72-97d7-d106-40a8-edfcbe563c98@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <af286d72-97d7-d106-40a8-edfcbe563c98@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 05:31:53PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Jean,
> 
> On 6/10/19 8:47 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> >  	/*
> > -	 * We don't need to issue any invalidation here, as we'll invalidate
> > -	 * the STE when installing the new entry anyway.
> > +	 * This function handles the following cases:
> > +	 *
> > +	 * (1) Install primary CD, for normal DMA traffic (SSID = 0).
> > +	 * (2) Install a secondary CD, for SID+SSID traffic.
> > +	 * (3) Update ASID of a CD. Atomically write the first 64 bits of the
> > +	 *     CD, then invalidate the old entry and mappings.
> Can you explain when (3) does occur?

When sharing a process context with devices (SVA), we write in that
context descriptor the ASID allocated by the arch ASID allocator for
that process. But that ASID might already have been allocated locally by
the SMMU driver for a private context. As there is a single ASID space
per SMMU for both private and shared ASIDs, we reallocated the private
ASID and update it here. See
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20180511190641.23008-25-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com/

> > +	 * (4) Remove a secondary CD.
> >  	 */
> > -	val = arm_smmu_cpu_tcr_to_cd(cfg->cd.tcr) |
> > +
> > +	if (!cdptr)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> Is that relevant? arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr() does not test ssid is within the
> cfg->s1cdmax range and always return smthg != NULL AFAIU.

It might return NULL with patch 5/8, when we can't allocate a 2nd-level
table. I can move the check over to that patch.

> > +	ret = arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(smmu_domain, 0, &smmu_domain->s1_cfg.cd);
> cfg.cd

Right.

Thanks,
Jean