Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath - PathScale InfiniPath driver
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Cc: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       openib-general@openib.org
In-Reply-To: <200512291901.jBTJ1rOm017519@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl>
References: <200512291901.jBTJ1rOm017519@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:26:24 -0500
Message-Id: <1135884385.6804.0.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 724
Lines: 18

On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 16:01 -0300, Horst von Brand wrote:
> >   - Someone asked for the kernel's i2c infrastructure to be used,but
> >     our i2c usage is very specialised, and it would be more of a mess
> >     to use the kernel's
> 
> Problem with that is that if everybody and Aunt Tillie does the same,
> the kernel as a whole gets to be a mess. 

ALSA does the exact same thing for the exact same reason.  Maybe an
indication that the kernel's i2c layer is too heavy?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/