Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 21:30:17 +0300
From:   "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc:     Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
        luto@amacapital.net, jannh@google.com, wad@chromium.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
        kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] seccomp: add two missing ptrace ifdefines
Message-ID: <20190919183017.GD22257@altlinux.org>
References: <20190918084833.9369-1-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
 <20190918084833.9369-3-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
 <20190918091512.GA5088@elm>
 <201909181031.1EE73B4@keescook>
 <20190919104251.GA16834@altlinux.org>
 <201909190918.443D6BC7@keescook>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201909190918.443D6BC7@keescook>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 09:55:30AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 01:42:51PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:33:09AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > This is actually fixed in -next already (and, yes, with the Fixes line
> > > Tyler has mentioned):
> > > 
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=next&id=69b2d3c5924273a0ae968d3818210fc57a1b9d07
> > 
> > Excuse me, does it mean that you expect each selftest to be self-hosted?
> > I was (and still is) under impression that selftests should be built
> > with headers installed from the tree. Is it the case, or is it not?
> 
> As you know (but to give others some context) there is a long-standing
> bug in the selftest build environment that causes these problems (it
> isn't including the uAPI headers) which you'd proposed to be fixed
> recently[1]. Did that ever get sent as a "real" patch? I don't see it
> in Shuah's tree; can you send it to Shuah?
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190805094719.GA1693@altlinux.org/

The [1] was an idea rather than a patch, it didn't take arch uapi headers
into account.  OK, I'll try to come up with a proper fix then.


-- 
ldv