Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1569015835.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
 <f627e66c455f52b5662bef6526d7c72869808401.1569015835.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
 <5d854c82.1c69fb81.66e1f.96ab@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <5d854c82.1c69fb81.66e1f.96ab@mx.google.com>
From:   Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 15:07:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHLCerPqEK2sSGGtDj85DH+qCzgtWi4ainuQv8BgQ3-Dgi93BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/15] arm64: dts: msm8996: thermal: Add interrupt support
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 3:02 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-09-20 14:52:24)
> > Register upper-lower interrupts for each of the two tsens controllers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 60 ++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > index 96c0a481f454..bb763b362c16 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > @@ -175,8 +175,8 @@
> >
> >         thermal-zones {
> >                 cpu0-thermal {
> > -                       polling-delay-passive = <250>;
> > -                       polling-delay = <1000>;
> > +                       polling-delay-passive = <0>;
> > +                       polling-delay = <0>;
>
> I thought the plan was to make this unnecessary to change?

IMO that change should be part of a different series to the thermal
core. I've not actually started working on it yet (traveling for the
next 10 days or so) but plan to do it.

Regards,
Amit