Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751300AbVL3Thj (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:37:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751301AbVL3Thj (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:37:39 -0500 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.207]:19429 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300AbVL3Thj convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:37:39 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SLbZCmtUMLudMlwfzgsztXIYMb/lIvg31HsPqfQQIrIzqjrrVO3nHAE8rsK5GdM9CJp8CoR7ZCRf5pMuJps2UPz6+Ywt3PRe5cpsY1gvM7ieSwgTvOi1GqU3iH0cx2GKbBdDdoxo5Xc2+9cXY51I/qBKP+Bt18BPPXySrJHqJEU= Message-ID: <986ed62e0512301137o3ee36bf1yadac63784cb75dd3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:37:38 -0800 From: "Barry K. Nathan" To: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit accounting for 2.4.32/2.4.33-pre1 Cc: Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, alan@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20051230183308.GA2501@w.ods.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051230074401.GA7501@ip68-225-251-162.oc.oc.cox.net> <20051230174817.GW15993@alpha.home.local> <1135966666.2941.32.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20051230183308.GA2501@w.ods.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1162 Lines: 25 On 12/30/05, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 07:17:46PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: [snip discussion not directly related to the timing of my patch submission] > > Also I think, to be honest, that this is a feature that is getting > > unsuitable for the "bugfixes only" 2.4 kernel series.... > > Agreed, it really is too late IMHO, because there's a non-null risk of > introducing new bugs with it. It would have been cool a few months > earlier. That won't stop me from trying it in my own tree however ;-) Yeah, I know it's a little bit late. I wish I had been able to get this done a few months ago... :( Oh well, even if it doesn't get into the tree, at least it looks like I might not be the only person to benefit from this patch. :) (BTW, you'll probably also want the patch I just posted, which adds Committed_AS to /proc/meminfo.) -- -Barry K. Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/