Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.3 135/203] sched/cpufreq: Align trace event behavior of fast switching
Date:   Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:42:41 -0400
Message-Id: <20190922184350.30563-135-sashal@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190922184350.30563-1-sashal@kernel.org>
References: <20190922184350.30563-1-sashal@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>

[ Upstream commit 77c84dd1881d0f0176cb678d770bfbda26c54390 ]

Fast switching path only emits an event for the CPU of interest, whereas the
regular path emits an event for all the CPUs that had their frequency changed,
i.e. all the CPUs sharing the same policy.

With the current behavior, looking at cpu_frequency event for a given CPU that
is using the fast switching path will not give the correct frequency signal.

Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 867b4bb6d4beb..b03ca2f73713d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static void sugov_fast_switch(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
 			      unsigned int next_freq)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
+	int cpu;
 
 	if (!sugov_update_next_freq(sg_policy, time, next_freq))
 		return;
@@ -126,7 +127,11 @@ static void sugov_fast_switch(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
 		return;
 
 	policy->cur = next_freq;
-	trace_cpu_frequency(next_freq, smp_processor_id());
+
+	if (trace_cpu_frequency_enabled()) {
+		for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus)
+			trace_cpu_frequency(next_freq, cpu);
+	}
 }
 
 static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
-- 
2.20.1