Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964939AbVL3XLq (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:11:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964947AbVL3XLq (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:11:46 -0500 Received: from mx.pathscale.com ([64.160.42.68]:26266 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964939AbVL3XLp (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:11:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath - PathScale InfiniPath driver From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org In-Reply-To: <20051230080002.GA7438@kroah.com> References: <20051230080002.GA7438@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: PathScale, Inc. Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:11:44 -0800 Message-Id: <1135984304.13318.50.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1142 Lines: 33 On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 00:00 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > - The driver still uses EXPORT_SYMBOL, for consistency with other > > code in drivers/infiniband > > Why would that matter? I don't want to do something gratuitously different to the prevailing set of code in which it lives. > > - We're still using ioctls instead of sysfs or configfs in some > > cases, to maintain userspace compatibility > > Compatibility with what? The driver isn't in the kernel tree yet, so > there's no old kernel versions to remain compatibile with :) We already ship userspace code to customers that relies on the ioctl interfaces. > I also noticed that you are still using the uint64_t type variable > types, can you please switch to the proper kernel types instead (u64 in > this specific example.) Yes, we'll use u64 for internal variables, and __u64 for stuff exported to userspace, etc.