Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932070AbVLaBPe (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:15:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932072AbVLaBPd (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:15:33 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:43686 "EHLO hera.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932070AbVLaBPd (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:15:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:13:40 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Matt Mackall Cc: Andreas Kleen , Denis Vlasenko , Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ? Message-ID: <20051230211340.GA3672@dmt.cnet> References: <7vbqzadgmt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <43A91C57.20102@cosmosbay.com> <200512281032.15460.vda@ilport.com.ua> <200512281054.26703.vda@ilport.com.ua> <3186311.1135792635763.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@imap-dhs.suse.de> <20051228210124.GB1639@waste.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051228210124.GB1639@waste.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 23 > > Note that just looking at slabinfo is not enough for this - you need the > > original > > sizes as passed to kmalloc, not the rounded values reported there. > > Should be probably not too hard to hack a simple monitoring script up > > for that > > in systemtap to generate the data. > > Something like this: > > http://lwn.net/Articles/124374/ Written with a systemtap script: http://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2005-q3/msg00550.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/