Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:25:03 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT v3 5/5] rcutorture: Avoid problematic critical section
 nesting on RT
Message-ID: <20190923162503.unezmzawx5vylkbh@linutronix.de>
References: <20190911165729.11178-1-swood@redhat.com>
 <20190911165729.11178-6-swood@redhat.com>
 <20190912221706.GC150506@google.com>
 <500cabaa80f250b974409ee4a4fca59bf2e24564.camel@redhat.com>
 <20190917100728.wnhdvmbbzzxolef4@linutronix.de>
 <26dbecfee2c02456ddfda3647df1bcd56d9cc520.camel@redhat.com>
 <20190917145035.l6egzthsdzp7aipe@linutronix.de>
 <b6b87f7acde58fcf0c172622eb9acef43a113ec4.camel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b6b87f7acde58fcf0c172622eb9acef43a113ec4.camel@redhat.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-09-17 11:32:11 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> Nice!  Are the "false positives" real issues from components that are
> currently blacklisted on RT, or something different?

So first a little bit of infrastructure like commit d5096aa65acd0
("sched: Mark hrtimers to expire in hard interrupt context") is required
so lockdep can see it all properly without RT enabled. Then we need
patches to avoid lockdep complaining about things that are not complained
about in RT because the lock is converted to raw_spinlock_t or something
different is applied so we don't have the warning.

> -Scott

Sebastian