Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJ-EccM49yBA+xgkR+3m5pEAJqmH_+FxfuAjijrQxaxxMUAt3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4gg6Hw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wh_CHD9fQOyF6D2q3hVdAhFOmR8vNzcq5ZPcxKW3Nc+2Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909231633400.54130@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.inter>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909231633400.54130@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.inter>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh4cuHsE8jFHO7XVatdXa=M2f4RHL3VwnSkAf5UNHUJ-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID LSM changes for 5.4
To:     James Morris <jamorris@linuxonhyperv.com>
Cc:     Micah Morton <mortonm@chromium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:35 PM James Morris <jamorris@linuxonhyperv.com> wrote:
>
> My understanding is that SafeSetID is shipping in ChromeOS -- this was
> part of the rationale for merging it.

Well, if even the developer didn't test it for two months, I don't
think "it's in upstream" makes any sense or difference.

                     Linus