Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
To:     robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org,
        leoyang.li@nxp.com, kishon@ti.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
        minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, roy.zang@nxp.com,
        jingoohan1@gmail.com, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com,
        andrew.murray@arm.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc:     Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/11] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting capability with different PEX
Date:   Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:18:45 +0800
Message-Id: <20190924021849.3185-8-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190924021849.3185-1-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
References: <20190924021849.3185-1-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different
capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI
capability, make it more flexible.

Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
---
v2:
 - Remove the repeated assignment code.
v3:
 - Use ep_func msi_cap and msix_cap to decide the msi_capable and
   msix_capable of pci_epc_features struct.
v4:
 - No change.

 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
index a9c552e..1e07287 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 
 struct ls_pcie_ep {
 	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
+	struct pci_epc_features	*ls_epc;
 };
 
 #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
@@ -40,26 +41,31 @@ static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
 	{ },
 };
 
-static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = {
-	.linkup_notifier = false,
-	.msi_capable = true,
-	.msix_capable = false,
-	.bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
-};
-
 static const struct pci_epc_features*
 ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 {
-	return &ls_pcie_epc_features;
+	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
+	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
+
+	return pcie->ls_epc;
 }
 
 static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 {
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
+	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
+	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
 	enum pci_barno bar;
 
+	ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, 0);
+	if (!ep_func)
+		return;
+
 	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++)
 		dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
+
+	pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep_func->msi_cap ? true : false;
+	pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep_func->msix_cap ? true : false;
 }
 
 static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
@@ -119,6 +125,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct dw_pcie *pci;
 	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
+	struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
 	struct resource *dbi_base;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -130,6 +137,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!pci)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ls_epc)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "regs");
 	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
 	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
@@ -140,6 +151,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
 	pcie->pci = pci;
 
+	ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
+
+	pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
+
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
 
 	ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
-- 
2.9.5