Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:08:43 +0300
From:   "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To:     Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de>
Cc:     "Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@intel.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nv@vosn.de,
        Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: Introduce acpi_load_table_with_index()
Message-ID: <20190924120843.GU2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <6851700.HULMXZj6Ep@kreacher>
 <20190923094701.24950-1-nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de>
 <20190924120734.GT2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190924120734.GT2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 03:07:34PM +0300, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:47:01AM +0200, Nikolaus Voss wrote:
> > For unloading an ACPI table, it is necessary to provide the
> > index of the table. The method intended for dynamically
> > loading or hotplug addition of tables, acpi_load_table(),
> > does not provide this information, so a new function
> > acpi_load_table_with_index() with the same functionality,
> > but an optional pointer to the loaded table index is introduced.
> > 
> > The new function is used in the acpi_configfs driver to save the
> > index of the newly loaded table in order to unload it later.
> 
> I'll test it later, though couple of remarks:
> - would it make sense to provide a counter part helper for unloading? Now it
>   looks a bit inconsistent in configfs when we use acpi_load_*() vs.
>   acpi_tb_*() in remove.

...and I think we may unexport acpi_tb_* in this case as Bob suggested for it
to be internal API.

> - please, include Ferry into Cc (as done in this mail)


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko