Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:25:15 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To:     Connor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com>
Cc:     Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        straube.linux@gmail.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NACK: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: remove dead code in do-while
 conditional step
Message-ID: <20190924152515.GD29696@kadam>
References: <20190923194806.25347-1-connor.kuehl@canonical.com>
 <52e473f0-6b92-9504-b86e-a73a0d82617f@canonical.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52e473f0-6b92-9504-b86e-a73a0d82617f@canonical.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

This email is fine, but I just want to make sure that you don't think
it's required.  We all assumed that you would send a v2.  I sort of hate
the word NACK as well because it sounds like shouting or ducks and those
are my two pet peeves.

Sometimes  people send a v2 patch without any replies to the original
email and we apply the v1 patch that's the only thing to avoid.

regards,
dan carpenter