Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:14:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:14:22 -0400 Received: from femail38.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.32]:59640 "EHLO femail38.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:14:13 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley Reply-To: landley@trommello.org Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do? Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:13:45 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: Andrew Morton , lkml In-Reply-To: <3BC3118B.8050001@wipro.com> <3BC42E65.3060706@wipro.com> <3BC446E0.5020604@wipro.com> In-Reply-To: <3BC446E0.5020604@wipro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01101018134508.11498@localhost.localdomain> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 10 October 2001 09:02, BALBIR SINGH wrote: > Balbir Singh wrote: > > Rob Landley wrote: > >> Or long lived kernel threads from short lived login sessions. ... > Ooh! sorry this is a wrong approach to send SIGCHLD to the previous parent. > AFAIK, all shells send their children SIGHUP when the shell exits, but SSH > may have some special security consideration in waiting for all children to > exit, does anyone know? > > Balbir The problem I mentioned above was the reason "reparent_to_init" was created in the first place. Here it is in the archive: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0105.0/0045.html I.E. already fixed... Google could probably find Jimmy Hoffa given half a chance... (If we could just figure out how to connect it up to maps.yahoo.com...) Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/