Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:22:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:22:05 -0400 Received: from krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:33297 "HELO krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:22:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 04:22:28 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alan Cox Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac11 Message-ID: <20011011042228.A10133@emma1.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <20011011001617.A4636@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011011001617.A4636@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > * Small fixes to various long standing bugs, various architecture and > * driver cleanups. The 2.4.10-ac tree now seems pretty solid. > * > > 2.4.10-ac11 > o Further VM tuning (Rik van Riel) Short version: Kicks ass! Long version: the sluggishness that 2.4.9, 2.4.10 and the previous -ac versions suffered from (not sure if 2.4.7 was also sluggish) seems to be gone, the machine is much quieter now and does not look like paralysed for seconds every now and then. Stress tests need to be done, but a make -j on various DJB tools which would start up only slowly now quickly zoom through. However, one thing strikes me on boot: ext3fs claims it's 0.9.6, while the ext3 web site tells us about 0.9.10. What's going on with 2.4.x-ac ext3fs? Should I be concerned? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/