Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:32:00 +0200
From:   Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To:     Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt>
Cc:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
        Ellie Reeves <ellierevves@gmail.com>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: aardvark: Use LTSSM state to build link
 training flag
Message-ID: <20190925143200.696af4cf@windsurf>
In-Reply-To: <20190522213351.21366-3-repk@triplefau.lt>
References: <20190522213351.21366-3-repk@triplefau.lt>
Organization: Bootlin
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello Remi,

On Wed, 22 May 2019 23:33:51 +0200
Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt> wrote:

> Aardvark's PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT flag in its link status register is not
> implemented and does not reflect the actual link training state (the
> flag is always set to 0). In order to support link re-training feature
> this flag has to be emulated. The Link Training and Status State
> Machine (LTSSM) flag in Aardvark LMI config register could be used as
> a link training indicator. Indeed if the LTSSM is in L0 or upper state
> then link training has completed (see [1]).
> 
> Unfortunately because after asking a link retraining it takes a while
> for the LTSSM state to become less than 0x10 (due to L0s to recovery
> state transition delays), LTSSM can still be in L0 while link training
> has not finished yet. So this waits for link to be in recovery or lesser
> state before returning after asking for a link retrain.
> 
> [1] "PCI Express Base Specification", REV. 4.0
>     PCI Express, February 19 2014, Table 4-14
> 
> Signed-off-by: Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt>

Here as well, sorry for the very long delay, and many thanks for the
great research work, including the arm-trusted-firmware fix. I reviewed
the implementation, and tested on my Armada 3720 DB board with a E1000E
NIC, and it all looks good to me.

Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com