Received: by 2002:a25:824b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d11csp1811356ybn; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:34:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqygcHrpREZczOnJg/dss86mrv6xHvnJ9CMBEnbRExpVTwKTAbwUzCIXcwlLR12RrFeLphV0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3066:: with SMTP id bs6mr2430592edb.127.1569490450363; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:34:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569490450; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XVgT9euEpLpXd3fFhgjnZKFt3KafGj3onY84P1HacKT+dMe2g1YbWQ/nbAYNm+kzYZ uSwR21zwdolKSIUBc6Y5gmH2o9VdIeXCq4RIt6kNm7jO7unEsS46dKPBrzZVGEDIE3qD 3MBCIQkYqmpwn+73acdq9NbmqTj9Z1kKmqPgBblXYtqhQIP7CcfR0Lmc0x6klCdo6mgx TPxl58jg0eghfmjsgOa96ToFp66KhlJRU9tu4nZUVHGOt9sR4OwyX/q33kwY7+cINXEG qFXJUR20Sz9CBd9H9Vz/ALbxzW5oFDmhlWvgBlvENhmDkYhWmrQTEPXhZR0DWGQlq+ST 7y2Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date :references:subject:cc:to:from; bh=ILjpJRGRfjYeYrrKeY+G5SZkQ9lYTBFIJZz85T8fjdQ=; b=j2o/SKyYYcyBgDRl+1yOIk/1sfvEe4E/2aoWKdc0rTxv3qM++Fb15hTa2DikzdzEJD OZVZsvetT9ABHuzQDTyiVWKq9IpnD3IH5FkppYve7BbznsYFPmmr+uGYulkcm+j/tyUC 0mBuJCz/Ak4ZmB8dcKouCjCgI5JthtnvA98hrgGMEg2cVMwuneN+y0tFimbR560xd1KC 4UFA//u2s6amnukmE7OUaDDdDewhA6N1rt3z+AZvr5tUn0/HzZxwv8HoHTIZ0ENrWpeG JsJPQvavPHlEuca542VKop64NqM9PJlIzp/D0Wqri6RJqMiOIKkR9qfHveBFlvpXab/o 2yWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y10si697503ejw.76.2019.09.26.02.33.46; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2407068AbfIYNvn (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:51:43 -0400 Received: from mailout.enyo.de ([116.203.30.208]:50645 "EHLO mailout.enyo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2406005AbfIYNvm (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:51:42 -0400 Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1iD7he-0001T4-DB; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:51:34 +0000 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iD7he-0006xX-93; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:51:34 +0200 From: Florian Weimer To: "Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" Cc: Christian Brauner , Oleg Nesterov , Jann Horn , "Eric W. Biederman" , Daniel Colascione , Joel Fernandes , linux-man , Linux API , lkml Subject: Re: For review: pidfd_send_signal(2) manual page References: <87pnjr9rth.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20190923142325.jowzbnwjw7g7si7j@wittgenstein> <90dd38d5-34b3-b72f-8e5a-b51f944f22fb@gmail.com> <20190924195701.7pw2olbviieqsg5q@wittgenstein> <20190924215316.gxev2anuqffegocw@wittgenstein> <331cc245-3f70-dd43-31f9-8c1680ca6b20@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:51:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <331cc245-3f70-dd43-31f9-8c1680ca6b20@gmail.com> (Michael Kerrisk's message of "Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:46:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87h850scux.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Michael Kerrisk: > If these conditions don't hold true, then the child process should > instead be created using clone(2) with the CLONE_PID flag. I think this should be CLONE_PIDFD.