Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932196AbWAAJv0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 04:51:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932197AbWAAJv0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 04:51:26 -0500 Received: from uproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.92.204]:59827 "EHLO uproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932196AbWAAJvZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 04:51:25 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Phswzf/sPhLS2tkNngZ9e0PnCwoLc25ovcJVItn7Bz+6XK16AT2ySLMGewVWOu0Kt07+FOf/f9drXPsi48A6z8cuB0t4gAFv1YhGVn4b4Zt3lQitF3oNRR3m3SjTffY+0LbpsrE8vM7WlDa/QnBvUkr47HzK01ajxrh+DsbQCeg= Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 11:51:21 +0200 From: Bradley Reed To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: MPlayer broken under 2.6.15-rc7-rt1? Message-ID: <20060101115121.034e6bb7@galactus.example.org> In-Reply-To: <1136106861.17830.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <20051231202933.4f48acab@galactus.example.org> <1136106861.17830.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100cvs108 (GTK+ 2.8.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1893 Lines: 44 On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 10:14:21 +0100 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 20:29 +0200, Bradley Reed wrote: > > I have tried MPlayer versions 1.0pre6, 1.0pre7, and cvs from today > > and they all work fine under 2.6.14 and 2.6.14-rt21/22. > > > > I booted into 2.6.15-rc7-rt1 and the same MPlayer binaries segfault > > on every video I try and play. Yes, I have nvidia modules loaded, > > so won't get much help, but thought someone might like to know. > > > you know, you could have done a little bit more effort and reproduced > this without the binary crud... it's not that hard you know and it > shows that you actually care about the problem enough that you want > to make it worthwhile for people to look into it. > And you could have saved the time and effort of replying, as you had nothing useful to say. Why do you expect kernel users (non-developers) to jump through hoops and cripple their systems in order to provide bug reports? Exactly how could I have tested MPLayer realistically without Xv support? It isn't that easy to swap video cards in a laptop. I noticed that after trying a new kernel a user space tool, which worked fine under earlier kernels, was no longer working. Linus himself said that this is worth pointing out. I did so. Yes, I was very fortunate in that someone else with a non-tainted kernel noticed a similar bug with /dev/rtc, and even more fortunate that Steven Rostedt provided a patch that worked for both of us. As I had said in my original post I was not expecting that, but thought the bug was worth reporting. DO YOU REALLY PREFER USERS NOT REPORT BUGS? Brad - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/