Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751337AbWAAMMK (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 07:12:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751340AbWAAMMK (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 07:12:10 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.202]:6683 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751337AbWAAMMJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 07:12:09 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mjnvL4f0ocdkMBWXX44nciRwZFPZNDZ2M3oPfchbHozlJfiIpd6XfH7xO2ufLeLn768NvH8HkTa591eM6l0G4EVuxOL2bmtey9lyqw8phPjs6zxkKfqcgGyb1LKtqNJPs8tombw5JBwpLAgXoxFNYV/hj6LtwdsRpsjXybjjh4s= Message-ID: <5a2cf1f60601010412r3ec10855s5ad6ed8e0a6f2ef1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 13:12:08 +0100 From: jerome lacoste To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: MPlayer broken under 2.6.15-rc7-rt1? Cc: Bradley Reed , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1136114772.17830.20.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051231202933.4f48acab@galactus.example.org> <1136106861.17830.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060101115121.034e6bb7@galactus.example.org> <1136114772.17830.20.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 949 Lines: 25 On 1/1/06, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > DO YOU REALLY PREFER USERS NOT REPORT BUGS? [...] > So getting back to your question: > I would say that I think it's generally better that bugs that cannot be > reproduced on an untainted kernel are not reported on lkml, but reported > to the vendor of the tainting module instead, simply because it's very > likely that it'll waste precious debug time. Although I like the idea of making the vendors of binary modules really aware of the costs they introduce with regard to debug issues on tainted system, if I was them, the first thing I would say is "contact the vendor of the part of the system that changed", i.e. the kernel. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/