Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932249AbWAATiI (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 14:38:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932250AbWAATiI (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 14:38:08 -0500 Received: from [202.67.154.148] ([202.67.154.148]:20438 "EHLO ns666.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932249AbWAATiG (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 14:38:06 -0500 Message-ID: <43B82F87.5010804@ns666.com> Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 20:37:43 +0100 From: Mark v Wolher User-Agent: Night Owl 3.12V X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiri Slaby CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sami Farin <7atbggg02@sneakemail.com>, jesper.juhl@gmail.com, s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk, Linux Kernel , rlrevell@joe-job.com, arjan@infradead.org, Linux and Kernel Video Subject: Re: References: <200512310027.47757.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <43B5D3ED.3080504@ns666.com> <200512310051.03603.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <43B5D6D0.9050601@ns666.com> <43B65DEE.906@ns666.com> <9a8748490512310308g1f529495ic7eab4bd3efec9e4@mail.gmail.com> <43B66E3D.2010900@ns666.com> <9a8748490512310349g10d004c7i856cf3e70be5974@mail.gmail.com> <43B67DB6.2070201@ns666.com> <43B6A14E.1020703@ns666.com> <20051231163414.GE3214@m.safari.iki.fi> <20051231163414.GE3214@m.safari.iki.fi> <43B6B669.6020500@ns666.com> <43B73DEB.4070604@ns666.com> <43B7D3BE.60003@ns666.com> <43B7EB99.8010604@ns666.com> <43B7EB99.8010604@ns666.com> <20060101183832.2BE0222AEE7@anxur.fi.muni.cz> <43B8241C.2020305@ns666.com> <20060101191221.7E34322AEAC@anxur.fi.muni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060101191221.7E34322AEAC@anxur.fi.muni.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1010 Lines: 29 Jiri Slaby wrote: > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>Em Dom, 2006-01-01 ? s 19:49 +0100, Mark v Wolher escreveu: >> >>>So, Mauro (or somebody from list), have you any idea, what could be >>>wrong? >> >> hmm.. have you sent the patch to the list? > > Yes, it was only a (bad) try to solve the problem. The point is, that there is > some weird problem in the estimating, or something (number of loops?). > > The oops and the patch are on lkml site in this thread, I would give you a > link, but lkml seems to be down for me. > [the patch helps in some way, but didn't solve the problem] > > all the best, But i wonder, can you think of something why grabdisplay causes crashes and overlay doesn't ? This needed patch, would it solve this problem too ? Thanks - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/