Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
To:     "'Mel Gorman'" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc:     "'Giovanni Gherdovich'" <ggherdovich@suse.cz>, <x86@kernel.org>,
        <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <pjt@google.com>,
        <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, <qperret@qperret.net>,
        <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
        <bp@suse.de>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
References: <20190909024216.5942-1-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <20190909024216.5942-2-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <000e01d568b5$87de9be0$979bd3a0$@net> <000301d56a76$0022e630$0068b290$@net> <1568730313.3329.1.camel@suse.cz> <001a01d56ef8$7abb07c0$70311740$@net> <20190924080608.GA3321@techsingularity.net>
In-Reply-To: <20190924080608.GA3321@techsingularity.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance
Date:   Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:52:13 -0700
Message-ID: <000b01d57300$cf611ce0$6e2356a0$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-ca
Thread-Index: AdVyrvSM5wisEN5wR+e/x84tTXNN3QAT9lPw
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019.09.24 01:06 Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 07:42:29AM -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
>> On 2019.09.17 07:25 Giovanni Gherdovich wrote:
>>>On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 08:28 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
>>> [...]
> 

> Hence, I think this patchset should be considered on its own merits.

Agree. 

> I think the patch is fine and should be merged with the main caveat being
> that some CPU families may need to use a different calculation to account
> for turbo boost which is a per-arch and per-cpu-family decision.

Agree.

> What, if anything, should change in this patchset before it can be merged?

Nothing, and apologies for the tangential discussion.

> Is that an acked-by?

Absolutely, if I am worthy of ack'ing then:

Acked-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>

... Doug