Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932272AbWAAVdv (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:33:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932273AbWAAVdv (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:33:51 -0500 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([202.147.117.210]:42435 "EHLO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932272AbWAAVdu (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:33:50 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.1 From: Keith Owens To: Lee Revell cc: Alistair John Strachan , Arjan van de Ven , Bradley Reed , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: MPlayer broken under 2.6.15-rc7-rt1? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 01 Jan 2006 13:57:14 CDT." <1136141835.13079.49.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 08:33:47 +1100 Message-ID: <29832.1136151227@ocs3.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1844 Lines: 37 Lee Revell (on Sun, 01 Jan 2006 13:57:14 -0500) wrote: >On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 14:31 +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote: >> On Sunday 01 January 2006 09:14, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> > On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 20:29 +0200, Bradley Reed wrote: >> > > I have tried MPlayer versions 1.0pre6, 1.0pre7, and cvs from today and >> > > they all work fine under 2.6.14 and 2.6.14-rt21/22. >> > > >> > > I booted into 2.6.15-rc7-rt1 and the same MPlayer binaries segfault on >> > > every video I try and play. Yes, I have nvidia modules loaded, so won't >> > > get much help, but thought someone might like to know. >> > >> > you know, you could have done a little bit more effort and reproduced >> > this without the binary crud... it's not that hard you know and it shows >> > that you actually care about the problem enough that you want to make it >> > worthwhile for people to look into it. >> >> REPORTING-BUGS should probably be fixed to make the points you repeatedly have >> to make. I agree 100% that people should not be reporting easily reproducible >> bugs with proprietary drivers loaded; what's a reboot to them? >> >> Let's add something to REPORTING-BUGS about tainted kernels and/or proprietary >> drivers. A quick grep of this file from 2.6.15-rc6 gives me no hits for >> "proprietary", "tainted" or "binary". >> > >Heh, wow, that's a serious omission. It would explain why so many users >post tainted bug reports then act like we're fanatics for telling them >not to do that ;-) Historically this was covered in the kernel FAQ, see http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/#s1-18. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/