Received: by 2002:a25:824b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d11csp3079291ybn; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:20:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCfEEDJfhpPMeI0/4SPIiRMGQamjKPNKJNj8VM1Vwf0ROIaheU+ukqtmnL9OP+aDLHQz19 X-Received: by 2002:a50:baab:: with SMTP id x40mr2961020ede.60.1569568838896; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:20:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569568838; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=f6CLDdGkyoIQbgZ4M2ruwUiIh8BK4ltPlF0oI/HgJ+IVvkFeD/ogStEa5DYNUK415p KcXEKhyLkMZbyxMK9D0kDxLSeL0HF1bxhsfgXPm04HodV1wKPuOG8GMiFBwa16C1mw01 cIK13/LpeGvQCP3bC7DepTdCBqMirU7ElZPK8pekMVBDQjmJL2nX5xGgo+uY5Ixm32Wg 2iIFVB5bbCG8FyrG4r5uXssnkxuWlNbL5CIRIbZ5TqDGFzlX3W2wbYAyBiUVZVxG0RaW 3qPwQg6uYO1S1WHizazm/2rUBgiKzyFFRa4DSOuN66dgIWg97cmmfB4CWFRtA4DtY4tO gkWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=xgbR8D8K6udio1G+h6RwRoCOFzzr2lwbFY3oILelCAI=; b=JAC122iNpanDhNo3iLn2DnHRC4iDRt231rAyi0Wm+rTkww4sPUqvSTAxdgOWtDHYqD aHM2q2cK2oi3COXljixIQCLg5bd+2OAuoN99Grl0+hOr8paJ7+sspJ880IPiDqXpIeUe 3ekkShqnFvSOZblX8GQROdM5mYGpO5f7V8M/Np9eP13VNl8NV2VUayIFkKj4rdjQ79hF RS2UAQ5xFn1uZDGPI8dP8risJ3/Z86jwmEr3rBjQrBF6PUtClvNOp8AWoXepiRMY+yUR Atn+fkUNjyR6COzhBeOd1eoBbBNUncqYuNllyH3c/R5lCuaTQXhNy1HSmd8oyFbGXAWS z2tA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cw1si2552564ejb.117.2019.09.27.00.20.13; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726217AbfI0HT5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:19:57 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:3226 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725804AbfI0HT5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:19:57 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5CA93AB8D235F5ACECF8; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:04:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.184.12.158) by DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:03:53 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/35] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Allow LPI invalidation via the DirectLPI interface To: Marc Zyngier , , CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Jason Cooper , Thomas Gleixner References: <20190923182606.32100-1-maz@kernel.org> <20190923182606.32100-4-maz@kernel.org> <92ff82ca-ebcb-8f5f-5063-313f65bbc5e3@huawei.com> <22202880-9a99-f0d9-4737-6112d60b30a6@kernel.org> From: Zenghui Yu Message-ID: <9399fbe3-5293-d34f-712e-3bf62680fda4@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:59:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <22202880-9a99-f0d9-4737-6112d60b30a6@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.184.12.158] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/9/27 0:17, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 26/09/2019 15:57, Zenghui Yu wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> I get one kernel panic with this patch on D05. > > Can you please try this (completely untested for now) on top of the > whole series? I'll otherwise give it a go next week. Yes, it helps. At least I don't see panic any more. Without this change, the host would get crashed as long as the VM is started. Thanks, zenghui > > Thanks, > > M. > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > index bc55327406b7..9d24236d1257 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > @@ -3461,15 +3461,16 @@ static void its_vpe_send_cmd(struct its_vpe *vpe, > > static void its_vpe_send_inv(struct irq_data *d) > { > + struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > + > if (gic_rdists->has_direct_lpi) { > - /* > - * Don't mess about. Generating the invalidation is easily > - * done by using the parent irq_data, just like below. > - */ > - direct_lpi_inv(d->parent_data); > - } else { > - struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > + void __iomem *rdbase; > > + /* Target the redistributor this VPE is currently known on */ > + rdbase = per_cpu_ptr(gic_rdists->rdist, vpe->col_idx)->rd_base; > + gic_write_lpir(d->parent_data->hwirq, rdbase + GICR_INVLPIR); > + wait_for_syncr(rdbase); > + } else { > its_vpe_send_cmd(vpe, its_send_inv); > } > } >