Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:29:34 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>, tglx@linutronix.de,
        linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PREEMPT_RT PATCH 2/3] i915: convert all irq_locks spinlocks to
 raw spinlocks
Message-ID: <20190927122934.2bz6ysx27ecw2uxa@linutronix.de>
References: <20190820003319.24135-1-clark.williams@gmail.com>
 <20190820003319.24135-3-clark.williams@gmail.com>
 <20190903080335.pe45dmgmjvdvbyd4@linutronix.de>
 <9EF2695D-3FBD-40E0-BE8A-EB71AF4155A5@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <9EF2695D-3FBD-40E0-BE8A-EB71AF4155A5@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-09-16 14:21:22 [-0700], Sean V Kelley wrote:
> I’ve tested this also on the v5.2.14-rt7 and can confirm that it avoids the need for making the locks raw.
> 
> Tested-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com>

Good. I went for an alternative approach in v5.2.17-rt9. Now I believe
that the three here are obsolete. If not, please give a sign.

> Thanks,
> 
> Sean

Sebastian