Received: by 2002:a25:824b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d11csp3578243ybn; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:19:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRLiROSPKZipHQhqPKIO/PNL5w2hI8YpUvRH+8lypuP079pq5thFRarMLCL6uhOMFm5hLu X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a44e:: with SMTP id cb14mr8286523ejb.277.1569597573480; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:19:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569597573; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GYus4jUk/6r4EdOKLcEocmb4B/DkoOgpaKWlAGkVgWpWX6gNy+/Hef48DtpOlXkRd+ slC+nCSpTKPgiQKGWl8hR0dcLPa5IQm85SXR414r5ugGWD9HW0jkluonlNo1Zb9JmpVp MTcNjMR8ArQuLHKI8qQUcQaBCH764TvM1ByD0Gmoxff8tjjSMJkan2q0Ld62H0KF+fv2 3fqCxkCWNeIuD5IFwhGwNboQAEg0hp7XdZk6YXpslTINWuXV/4/cAxBq3pNxwuGT0TVK H47ErWyijiHdnnA514bBlhnLkYydtkFgPN2YTkJCbdA03xlfQo6pXIBCNtLM8JqCwIyY wa3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:to:references:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version; bh=H0D/AioNnFZcANUt8q2A40yZTAAhh9+hyv3iC34/EQw=; b=UIqtc2oXrl3vQumsZQjs4EbEs1efwamD7Rq2FLU15I9AINjMswPdpRIiv0T3RlmsqN 3tDuXIyGZ70+xQDJ3/4YuVGCmSn0CMg3q4qYKZj7wiEpLMZxWX0JDkeHcXvMzJKsq32W JZifpl5WVAPeV6MEGpcrWQQ6+8G/UuYHsTyF8KQ53EdqOHbhe0CSVYBqWTtncNKaEuij uZkEVvq5xXRzUHm3aAjHMINfSVuUfXQ0EaesUVHwpKjpnwtSEjrGRRxrbrWHLrpCx/03 TafBeIkMGSOh+xI7dCoLWZRHtm8TD3Tr7Q0oyOBepBYI7bs+2CTLyZ+X2Y7geVSs44Lz ta1Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b22si2785917eje.299.2019.09.27.08.19.06; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727416AbfI0PSo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:18:44 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:33225 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726251AbfI0PSo (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:18:44 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Sep 2019 08:18:43 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,555,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="184011673" Received: from kwells1-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.254.66.7]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Sep 2019 08:18:43 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: [PREEMPT_RT PATCH 2/3] i915: convert all irq_locks spinlocks to raw spinlocks From: Sean V Kelley In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:18:42 -0700 Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Thomas Gleixner , RT , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <350F3734-FB0F-4D71-92FD-59EEAF9CCB0B@linux.intel.com> References: <20190820003319.24135-1-clark.williams@gmail.com> <20190820003319.24135-3-clark.williams@gmail.com> <20190903080335.pe45dmgmjvdvbyd4@linutronix.de> <9EF2695D-3FBD-40E0-BE8A-EB71AF4155A5@linux.intel.com> <20190927122934.2bz6ysx27ecw2uxa@linutronix.de> To: Clark Williams X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Sep 27, 2019, at 7:58 AM, Clark Williams wrote: > > I'm running v5.2.17-rt9 now and have not seen any i915 related splats. I think we're good to drop my patches > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:29 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2019-09-16 14:21:22 [-0700], Sean V Kelley wrote: > > I’ve tested this also on the v5.2.14-rt7 and can confirm that it avoids the need for making the locks raw. > > > > Tested-by: Sean V Kelley > > Good. I went for an alternative approach in v5.2.17-rt9. Now I believe > that the three here are obsolete. If not, please give a sign. Confirmed as well.. Sean > > > Thanks, > > > > Sean > > Sebastian