Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:33:04 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Cc:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>, emamd001@umn.edu,
        smccaman@umn.edu, kjlu@umn.edu,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: prevent memory leak in
 snd_skl_parse_uuids
Message-ID: <20190927153304.GS32742@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20190925161922.22479-1-navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
 <13f4bd40-dbaa-e24e-edca-4b4acff9d9c5@linux.intel.com>
 <20190927025526.GD22969@cs-dulles.cs.umn.edu>
 <dc68e0dc-9a8e-cc52-c560-3e86c783dbb3@linux.intel.com>
 <6966df25-e82c-1abe-6a0f-ff497dcda23b@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6966df25-e82c-1abe-6a0f-ff497dcda23b@intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 05:10:18PM +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote:

> I'm fine with solution #1 as I guess asking to wait for refactor is not an
> option. Code deployment is delayed due to range of administrative decisions,
> some of which should be uncovered on alsa-devel soon enough.

The problem with solution #1 is freeing orphaned pointer. It will work,
but it's simple is not okay from object life time prospective.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko