Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: x86: clarify what is reported on
 KVM_GET_MSRS failure
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
References: <20190927155413.31648-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <9af23f2e-6f82-e597-abec-ee69c9735faa@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:06:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190927155413.31648-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 27/09/19 17:54, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> When KVM_GET_MSRS fail the report looks like
> 
> ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
>   lib/x86_64/processor.c:1089: r == nmsrs
>   pid=28775 tid=28775 - Argument list too long
>      1	0x000000000040a55f: vcpu_save_state at processor.c:1088 (discriminator 3)
>      2	0x00000000004010e3: main at state_test.c:171 (discriminator 4)
>      3	0x00007fb8e69223d4: ?? ??:0
>      4	0x0000000000401287: _start at ??:?
>   Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSRS, r: 36 (failed at 194)
> 
> and it's not obvious that '194' here is the failed MSR index and that
> it's printed in hex. Change that.
> 
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> index c53dbc6bc568..6698cb741e10 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> @@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_state *vcpu_save_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid)
>  	for (i = 0; i < nmsrs; i++)
>  		state->msrs.entries[i].index = list->indices[i];
>  	r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_MSRS, &state->msrs);
> -        TEST_ASSERT(r == nmsrs, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSRS, r: %i (failed at %x)",
> +        TEST_ASSERT(r == nmsrs, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSRS, r: %i (failed MSR was 0x%x)",
>                  r, r == nmsrs ? -1 : list->indices[r]);
>  
>  	r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_DEBUGREGS, &state->debugregs);
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo