Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751122AbWABXKn (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2006 18:10:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751124AbWABXKn (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2006 18:10:43 -0500 Received: from relay01.mail-hub.dodo.com.au ([203.220.32.149]:53965 "EHLO relay01.mail-hub.dodo.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751122AbWABXKn (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2006 18:10:43 -0500 From: Grant Coady To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Antonio Vargas , gcoady@gmail.com, Andrew Morton , Adrian Bunk , mingo@elte.hu, tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de, torvalds@osdl.org, davej@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mpm@selenic.com Subject: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 10:10:37 +1100 Organization: http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/ Reply-To: gcoady@gmail.com Message-ID: References: <20051229224839.GA12247@elte.hu> <20051230074916.GC25637@elte.hu> <20051231143800.GJ3811@stusta.de> <20051231144534.GA5826@elte.hu> <20051231150831.GL3811@stusta.de> <20060102103721.GA8701@elte.hu> <20060102134228.GC17398@stusta.de> <20060102102824.4c7ff9ad.akpm@osdl.org> <1136227746.2936.46.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <69304d110601021403o59a10c77i3d9ef8dc046e27bd@mail.gmail.com> <1136242584.2839.1.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1136242584.2839.1.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2876 Lines: 61 On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:56:23 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >I proposed the following chunks: > >Adds a bit of text to Documentation/Codingstyle to state that >inlining everything "just because" is a bad idea > >Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven > >diff -purN linux-2.6.15-rc6/Documentation/CodingStyle linux-2.6.15-rc6-deinline/Documentation/CodingStyle >--- linux-2.6.15-rc6/Documentation/CodingStyle 2005-10-28 02:02:08.000000000 +0200 >+++ linux-2.6.15-rc6-deinline/Documentation/CodingStyle 2005-12-30 13:31:13.000000000 +0100 >@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ Remember: if another thread can find you > have a reference count on it, you almost certainly have a bug. > > >- Chapter 11: Macros, Enums, Inline functions and RTL >+ Chapter 11: Macros, Enums and RTL > > Names of macros defining constants and labels in enums are capitalized. > >@@ -429,7 +429,35 @@ from void pointer to any other pointer t > language. > > >- Chapter 14: References >+ Chapter 14: The inline disease >+ >+There appears to be a common misperception that gcc has a magic "make me >+faster" ricing option called "inline". While the use of inlines can be ^^^^^^--?? not sure what this is >+appropriate (for example as a means of replacing macros, see Chapter 11), it >+very often is not. Abundant use of the inline keyword leads to a much bigger >+kernel, which in turn slows the system as a whole down, due to a bigger >+icache footprint for the CPU and simply because there is less memory >+available for the pagecache. Just think about it; a pagecache miss causes a >+disk seek, which easily takes 5 miliseconds. There are a LOT of cpu cycles >+that can go into these 5 miliseconds. >+ >+A reasonable rule of thumb is to not put inline at functions that have more >+than 3 lines of code in them. An exception to this rule are the cases where >+a parameter is known to be a compiletime constant, and as a result of this >+constantness you *know* the compiler will be able to optimize most of your >+function away at compile time. For a good example of this later case, see >+the kmalloc() inline function. >+ >+Often people argue that adding inline to functions that are static and used >+only once is always a win since there is no space tradeoff. While this is >+technically correct, gcc is capable of inlining these automatically without >+help, and the maintenance issue of removing the inline when a second user >+appears outweighs the potential value of the hint that tells gcc to do >+something it would have done anyway. Seems sane, reasonable and mostly readable to me, thank you. Grant. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/