Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 01:17:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 01:17:45 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:6207 "EHLO flinx.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 01:17:27 -0400 To: Mike Fedyk Cc: Doug McNaught , Lew Wolfgang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dump corrupts ext2? In-Reply-To: <20011010173811.C3795@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> From: ebiederman@uswest.net (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 10 Oct 2001 23:07:42 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20011010173811.C3795@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mike Fedyk writes: > IIRC, 2.2 didn't have a coherent buffer and page cache also. > > I.E. if you "cat /dev/hda > /dev/null" you wouldn't be able to expect any > speedup when reading through the mounted filesystem (except for meta-data?). > > Am I wrong? Has Linux ever had a coherent page and buffer cache? In 2.2 all writes went through the buffer cache. So for the buffer cache was coherent with the filesystem but the filesystem wasn't coherent with the buffer cache. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/