Received: by 2002:a25:824b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d11csp6395928ybn; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 19:22:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzscqklibVCiuovoyC5FQt0MBJf87A1RcRdfrc9y+E2GD0kthdO1zwFsGu2t96XLGAAoPoW X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d295:: with SMTP id w21mr17534412edq.302.1569810163575; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 19:22:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569810163; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uoWWguIN/q3TzPXrDbA48TiiH91g/eryRImJ57r6ZNhqx2qU0jdcZ6VXu8p/XSc5q2 E9IsIynYP+NzLgKbKDnUAf41hzV8x3c5cCBQOjeB5ztV8lbZDpyeNooNvX9hoWowlAkA c5gy0Cl8yLsqGnXHe85n+qr5/gP59cYCNdYrCEsNR7Lad4xXyFYpK5kvKhQWXSZd5jMI tMTIxi0jmRZ14Fn4iqZ+2Va8Rlb5mZe0w7SCahvgrIOmzu1FnDESWsjuB7A2rVekQRwM ncgeunsbAHU5Vzrc2KqJ06K7qMXqyi1XHDp4iQPFvZHk5hE8/4RpF1VMb0p/f4YLb4nX t+7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=xst919LMCCytKZBNEC3a+gHcEWNr8Q42vymIFRgX4sk=; b=grdE0OhRIiV+c31rFC9xQLpD+sTKEbL6MhxAeYRvyCBGrhz1jw4a5UpTnoGX6nFI/C M4yiKAzofoiQzz5Y2FDbQbMtHh+ht5LaoqS6aKdMEctQeKrp22E1FKzCgPjkmw4qIJuV qrC05bDFCgbNjQ2bPay8qKOueu/vlr3eH4aSkHY61v3S7VapTwK/GD5+EI7o1Fk3CJ7L DLf30svUKhge9OV2tcXszkm/64Wk81/oiyxERhxnhaBd57RYw+auVs4MFjrd4c+w9Dw2 nmbOlq92G4InYo7w4HgYaDrRYmMN9K5aEZvAnzKVQDYs9seY2VfXYYZYCzq64wODXcNK Oghg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a23si6828897edj.201.2019.09.29.19.22.18; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 19:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729386AbfI3CWP (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 22:22:15 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:39482 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729022AbfI3CWO (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 22:22:14 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8U2LeoK183973 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 22:22:13 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2va35rgcvq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 22:22:13 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:22:10 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:22:07 +0100 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8U2M69T60686428 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 02:22:06 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8829AA405B; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 02:22:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3402CA405F; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 02:22:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 02:22:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsilva.ozlabs.ibm.com (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9353A01C1; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:22:04 +1000 (AEST) From: "Alastair D'Silva" To: alastair@d-silva.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Oscar Salvador , Michal Hocko , David Hildenbrand , Pavel Tatashin , Dan Williams , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] memory_hotplug: Add a bounds check to __add_pages Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:21:51 +1000 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190930022152.14114-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> References: <20190930022152.14114-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19093002-0012-0000-0000-00000351E41C X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19093002-0013-0000-0000-0000218C8465 Message-Id: <20190930022152.14114-2-alastair@au1.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-30_01:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909300024 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alastair D'Silva On PowerPC, the address ranges allocated to OpenCAPI LPC memory are allocated from firmware. These address ranges may be higher than what older kernels permit, as we increased the maximum permissable address in commit 4ffe713b7587 ("powerpc/mm: Increase the max addressable memory to 2PB"). It is possible that the addressable range may change again in the future. In this scenario, we end up with a bogus section returned from __section_nr (see the discussion on the thread "mm: Trigger bug on if a section is not found in __section_nr"). Adding a check here means that we fail early and have an opportunity to handle the error gracefully, rather than rumbling on and potentially accessing an incorrect section. Further discussion is also on the thread ("powerpc: Perform a bounds check in arch_add_memory") http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190827052047.31547-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva --- mm/memory_hotplug.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index c73f09913165..1909607da640 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -278,6 +278,22 @@ static int check_pfn_span(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, return 0; } +static int check_hotplug_memory_addressable(unsigned long pfn, + unsigned long nr_pages) +{ + const u64 max_addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn + nr_pages) - 1; + + if (max_addr >> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) { + const u64 max_allowed = (1ull << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS + 1)) - 1; + WARN(1, + "Hotplugged memory exceeds maximum addressable address, range=%#lx-%#lx, maximum=%#lx\n", + PFN_PHYS(pfn), max_addr, max_allowed); + return -E2BIG; + } + + return 0; +} + /* * Reasonably generic function for adding memory. It is * expected that archs that support memory hotplug will @@ -291,6 +307,10 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, unsigned long nr, start_sec, end_sec; struct vmem_altmap *altmap = restrictions->altmap; + err = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(pfn, nr_pages); + if (err) + return err; + if (altmap) { /* * Validate altmap is within bounds of the total request -- 2.21.0