Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 01:23:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 01:23:27 -0400 Received: from [200.222.195.189] ([200.222.195.189]:55959 "EHLO pervalidus.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 01:23:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 02:23:54 -0300 From: =?unknown-8bit?B?RnLpZOlyaWMgTC4gVy4=?= Meunier <0@pervalidus.net> To: "D. Stimits" Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [2.4.10] README and Documentation/Changes inconsistent Message-ID: <20011011022354.O249@pervalidus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i X-Mailer: Mutt/1.3.21i - Linux 2.4.10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org D. Stimits wrote: > My first attempt at this question didn't seem to make it in. > On RH 7.1, which has kgcc (2.91.66) and gcc 2.96, will it be > necessary to install a third compiler for stable 2.4.10+ > compiles? AFAIK not for 2.4. > Can kgcc still work for this? If kgcc = egcs 1.1.2, I suppose so. I compiled 2.4.10 and all earlier 2.4 with it. Anyway, I compiled 2.95.4 right now and 2.4.11 will use it. Time to remove egcs. Maybe it's the recommended compiler for 2.2 (?), but I don't intend to downgrade. BTW, these files don't say that 2.95.4 is from CVS and not a final release. If you have the 2.95.3 sources, then cvs rdiff -u -r gcc-2_95_3 -r gcc-2_95-branch gcc > gcc-2.95.4.patch is your friend. -- 0@pervalidus.{net, {dyndns.}org} Tel: 55-21-2717-2399 (Niter?i-RJ BR) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/