Received: by 2002:a25:824b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d11csp6620054ybn; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:39:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyXjQJdqoV+uTdGRzCMfyxGgH0AjZtPd4qEffa7PQ1CJO9wR24UssjJ7piDo8ojd6h+JA7V X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1ade:: with SMTP id ba30mr18325581edb.304.1569829158384; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:39:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569829158; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RuvUGKkWkYbw5As6ipkbyWvNhhinwuUO6ct0pCQSUO4OVpY1zqw71GmuBm5gYYlb1S TRWOFAc3SxYxTHGRpGSTubIdUCfEFRDzwVfOVCLR0YPyI6pQVWmwjgJWcSzKXG3iwRKv +Cf8ZZvuMJmatfv8Ziclw8XkQDSQfSoBCKLa2jz1GEKPs9CPsUNXqm4Oa/tHIvRhaD9A szM0X28GYzysrrU/zsAO53NS61CERRuSnMKIqCNDKEr1RCT2GWL1Bb5YLzFnyWqkIvVo yuZ+2Puj7Z1qENtq+n9c2QTlqe0Xj2p1WLoQJ1XgEjV3TG+Mqk7w1jXu/03VXpu5nEqd o9Lw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=2U0PVBDWcszbZoiHOE1x2DHR9I+u4NAbZrsvuHRaWWA=; b=tL3a6poBD4Y1r0c+mCYpGbYODh9hDLBAekWoUxctRQeGo1OPXcaDtctvkqTATDrc+M RxSimwnoRabIl2yliUGPdhVD/MiaD3Vgwxy1t+IBR6eoP2r/tjGGo8ih/6JqYTVDhgJ+ YH1lgLA7BdLCTBnB/XVz0Xu4bPHHfJ1/CV2W04pXRwOKGBBihu6BG/V8+HkcU9FC/va1 KkLH6Ua9S/VNgKPKl7piPbN5AnGW2Wqe/jxEvDP2f1Gnm8tm7Qn5Fu0JUGKY/ScMc2n6 GkyPJeh9818bR+Zw4bZApXFLL0XNrYR9wWR5QpnMgbZQ+p4mTr+tbYKE3XmUUmCROwxB XrWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h14si6505929edb.425.2019.09.30.00.38.52; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729326AbfI3HgZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:36:25 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:3233 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725940AbfI3HgZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:36:25 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EC41A3B0846FBE479BC4; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:36:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:36:17 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 53/63] f2fs: fix to do sanity check on segment bitmap of LFS curseg To: Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: , , Jaegeuk Kim , Sasha Levin References: <20190929135031.382429403@linuxfoundation.org> <20190929135040.450358370@linuxfoundation.org> <20190930072157.GB22914@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <43edc2f2-5b42-0cd7-1573-af77fd9e6678@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:36:16 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190930072157.GB22914@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 2019/9/30 15:21, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > >> + for (blkofs += 1; blkofs < sbi->blocks_per_seg; blkofs++) { >> + if (!f2fs_test_bit(blkofs, se->cur_valid_map)) >> + continue; >> +out: >> + f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR, >> + "Current segment's next free block offset is " >> + "inconsistent with bitmap, logtype:%u, " >> + "segno:%u, type:%u, next_blkoff:%u, blkofs:%u", >> + i, curseg->segno, curseg->alloc_type, >> + curseg->next_blkoff, blkofs); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } > > So this is detecting filesystem corruption, right? Should it be > -EUCLEAN? Was fixed in another commit 10f966bbf521 ("f2fs: use generic EFSBADCRC/EFSCORRUPTED"). :) Thanks, > > Pavel >