Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <1569847603.2639.0.camel@suse.com>
Subject: Re: 4f5368b5541a902f6596558b05f5c21a9770dd32 causes regression
From:   Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc:     Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@suse.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:46:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uHicakgeTEUhK63R4yKh+HMHCmy11L_o5PCSJoLG65BYg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1569439345.3084.5.camel@suse.com>
         <CAKMK7uHicakgeTEUhK63R4yKh+HMHCmy11L_o5PCSJoLG65BYg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Am Mittwoch, den 25.09.2019, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> which undoes any side-effect of the patch you're pointing at. I am
> rather surprised though that this results in a hard-lookup for you,
> did you confirm the bisect by reverting that commit on top of latest
> upstream?

Hi,

yes, a straight revert fixes the issue.

	Regards
		Oliver