Received: by 2002:a25:824b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d11csp7083280ybn; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:24:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxZCSacM70oJHqNqSWKb3x3i5A8CmS0nNjkqciPgnLJAdobvcrUe02tJu/kLbEx1AP7LaWQ X-Received: by 2002:a50:fa83:: with SMTP id w3mr20133805edr.262.1569857089642; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:24:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569857089; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dCl9KTmULrl6BJf5ZO2WmaufSNPsa3wV0Wr6pdSbXNPLeVvsYW2P1fT8xYBhIz6OB+ 37XpPmCQLfZoq21w6O6XS98Yx1BzW6ij7UWZ7wjFo8gsaoo/91/mqBGwp7bOFCa8xUbH XErbyLd+dhZVpHWKAgZxY2yapHAKa1yBHIx/vJ41TLZpJ0tJtWEMy2R1nEskDYa+XBEf KXWEyfvPyvlU3K/rx+t4iiCXbb67itxQ0mL0fyebeZcTH+aM01a6l8wlRQpzafkttdBC Yia25VM/KpfQcTwE9Uz17txZSaTWwlo+bfou1JLCEwZTF2HfmdwE/uzSmZsCkdeZTuRE r78w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=8HKacM6sHRzyZgKopSHdE59j+eiLZ00J50hLlPkJ1XA=; b=a9vmD1dDM5HWk5mfmFg1E9uAobe5sRkUkL/nWH5KKH4WbmSBNr+A/SAkEAXcQkTgjO sO7itjqkOzXHgM3weI4FtZ9CSw9c9e4iL/G6gWUcm4cp7u2Fy1DX+k1Mtd1fvgVUlqpK pNtlIxPGHhWmh3KXdGto0CRwvTTcRq1aH3OJdjfx8U1C6W80//owJX792FSN+AvOj60n LoYYFJDTcyd15Rvxgix/5SEhSKQN2Q5VV7hETdKBYppJ1ijcSzTOWccaiZ5olApkZHiE R5psG0KMEHVFHW3AiW1ZSe1jDRgz4ESvJ++rv4lss1BN3UTgB/9DiR1BTY0PN+TTaWqK uwOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@digitalocean.com header.s=google header.b=Slx6Q233; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=digitalocean.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j46si7189604eda.9.2019.09.30.08.24.25; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@digitalocean.com header.s=google header.b=Slx6Q233; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=digitalocean.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731982AbfI3PWv (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:22:51 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com ([209.85.160.193]:44369 "EHLO mail-qt1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731127AbfI3PWu (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:22:50 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id u40so17514457qth.11 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:22:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digitalocean.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8HKacM6sHRzyZgKopSHdE59j+eiLZ00J50hLlPkJ1XA=; b=Slx6Q233ul7BctWF7jvQiBNkK0Wuthfu75EYw66j3xhD6wzh9IedmDVhLN5t0+eAa1 /zS9A4cOYUzMrnzgJXa53Q0usr5z5vhBtjU5blb8XG1Ko5uglOqgy+r15b6exW0MtIp4 V5JD4+63UfsY0v+yUuJVaSzbKCdbW1rJHLg0U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8HKacM6sHRzyZgKopSHdE59j+eiLZ00J50hLlPkJ1XA=; b=uaMJCS7SH7+aA5ye/x7a4yHuQoPDWF6oNIA5ei+LiPMcgNp2kwpgkliZ7S2Fy8GM7n E48f/2zBirBEXqMG3yfzCJyFw24J6r19NDTV57Nbl5a5qOsI5aFWOVD4t19hGfUZH5M/ En4JyMfKr+T3iLnhTfW168W8P55Wo+IrGI2TRo6t3Mg7rV8i8UzextLvj83lzYKLK9IV a9QcvKKixA/OqZfWFAVbdKc6jkMsaocZhGc+BjuA7vam8CJ/ZRU+gVwgik4+Q4q1F7gQ OZ3uzsBHnF2BKvNmoY31oA9A1D5eoVxni+IORmNAQv/bOz/aTttXd60x89Bd7dVP8Rjv vUeg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUpWnHMqvFW1aFf8aJkosshaHVokqpiB9c8Buz6DUOtGDKT7QSy 4L2DFPdzK4YHOCWCB3xbVO1HjA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5414:: with SMTP id b20mr8636045qtq.85.1569856969775; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sinkpad (192-222-189-155.qc.cable.ebox.net. [192.222.189.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 139sm6168276qkf.14.2019.09.30.08.22.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:22:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:22:40 -0400 From: Julien Desfossez To: Tim Chen Cc: Dario Faggioli , "Li, Aubrey" , Aaron Lu , Aubrey Li , Subhra Mazumdar , Vineeth Remanan Pillai , Nishanth Aravamudan , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Paul Turner , Linus Torvalds , Linux List Kernel Mailing , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Kees Cook , Greg Kerr , Phil Auld , Valentin Schneider , Mel Gorman , Pawan Gupta , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] Core scheduling v3 Message-ID: <20190930152240.GA13385@sinkpad> References: <20190619183302.GA6775@sinkpad> <20190718100714.GA469@aaronlu> <20190725143003.GA992@aaronlu> <20190726152101.GA27884@sinkpad> <7dc86e3c-aa3f-905f-3745-01181a3b0dac@linux.intel.com> <20190802153715.GA18075@sinkpad> <69cd9bca-da28-1d35-3913-1efefe0c1c22@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mutt 1.9.4 (2018-02-28) User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I've made an attempt in the following two patches to address > the load balancing of mismatched load between the siblings. > > It is applied on top of Aaron's patches: > - sched: Fix incorrect rq tagged as forced idle > - wrapper for cfs_rq->min_vruntime > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190725143127.GB992@aaronlu/ > - core vruntime comparison > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190725143248.GC992@aaronlu/ > > I will love Julien, Aaron and others to try it out. Suggestions > to tune it is welcomed. Just letting you know that I will be testing your load balancing patches this week along with the changes Vineeth is currently doing. I didn't test it before because I was focused on single threaded and pinned micro-benchmarks, but I am back on scaling tests so it will be interesting to see. Thanks, Julien