Received: by 2002:a25:824b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d11csp7539740ybn; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:48:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzGV6Ehw0g8c4+OBbuPxhxbqqAqoNlIQsl1YR9LIbYH+lXnoCG0GcV/9Tfy5pRjuEU6y0jf X-Received: by 2002:a50:ac03:: with SMTP id v3mr22444481edc.113.1569883704601; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:48:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569883704; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sYeqZydBim5tYkT+JEZJrHjjpZ1DcAtOIsntZLqPmQ3uRVMJlJ73AOSa4r1fGKqWD5 QNrQree67tLeA+cMHyKCxFL7e6V4BdZFKPdIN0GI8kPeQzP4m+bQcy4NtT9r542h0CnG m0rLcfI81xWqFm3T9U1G6n9K/K1Qk6ceoTPCIoHBtVEPKXoeDPNFgtZ2kHVCemDnguXN x38hfqdH3k/1p6gpCnvmUP/m1N7p/Se/g14W35/HK4cyWZXgl8NnRmuyH4nH4YcluKYf uT97msRg8a+bJwUicm459OUFxCU2Ybwbu5noMO7KZthPVPuDsEhfi6J9jf2GF4ewgzDa bcAA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=cK5Fghk/yA6wH8i7i1QdxuNjNjer/uYW7DYZEo/GN74=; b=QfFy3oFuZMfH5flUM+WbndpFlPIuFElblXYJVAzY9uh19omrlAeHPYycxJw/xvJvYj +v0xtuPUmLBxbK3t28HVck9PF/mwGM2H9wWrm8vKKb6AxBReZNdHupAQ3t69Hx+8O/dZ jcWyW9esyZovub0gtvMHrNRCuClOt8hwBNAdTqXm05w+DDqxElVKlGSBSfor77wc1q57 M948hje3ibRDAgajs/WMn1d+zLoPy7N+8JvM42oJZ3Ehc/HBSFNtMLm9cr/6OysYK9EJ 4M8jIlzJMzljShP7RVkxYq/cknaIbh+FICAxY5zOq3Ws4V5I0vw0/atumRWtDZev7cHe B2uQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UsyIMUg0; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bo22si7663029ejb.369.2019.09.30.15.48.00; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UsyIMUg0; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731717AbfI3WpB (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:45:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com ([209.85.214.194]:46336 "EHLO mail-pl1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726789AbfI3WpA (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:45:00 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id q24so4454808plr.13; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:45:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=cK5Fghk/yA6wH8i7i1QdxuNjNjer/uYW7DYZEo/GN74=; b=UsyIMUg00LtJE64A4LiLe6eJzVF1zL6nphsK2U/Q2IqWrZP53dG4q1VEndLOUOYNYn 5SEp3DRw3l7cXZ1osu3JlTEVDyzECiVpf9CZRZ+qF7EK8okwLv7gA5HXg3vLTVgj3toJ oE3oSQHrwjSgFSD6WS0XcDb/z8Q0ATme8RO9xD/byhPytcMAtRt6rhOoarHWAyjEK9hN OSXg/8HIwuMV/3mcDLh2yRcG3pIL2Lh/Pl+OTPlEuxgZKB0ZkFhU5n00g3bZjnQ7tiIL XXhd2dPfa8WSw2dXTy1o38zQlEVtZweCcrWF0Ce7wmvm/rWPWuzJjX7/TE1vyxfptElF 18ZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=cK5Fghk/yA6wH8i7i1QdxuNjNjer/uYW7DYZEo/GN74=; b=IFEJZwyXa6MjGVtKM3tUgZGdVNTmpHxoqFIi4bOElO7O6Jx2Rt0c800zsSxqpsouE/ f/TShsR5ufdu4WkUiCmO30FEGnMJHsyBXWVJScx9F1yY7pg3RVXoj1qB1pP9Gp0jgx5Y cSaPMST73Ov8Bx+cpkc8g0fpHDJVJjBJ6yNdQ7gQR1fFCyHSyG6+HO1bn9H25ljgq1AP WVvjREUuWsvSgEjHSd6jpU22Sz0vPdRRpYpZosyL3AjjLdfG4Hon1OAxrEtG9ayfhwhE n1tgVHF9sd5GbnG6RPF4IoOh81TN6UqsqLUTROzc9JvgIXS7V6L7vldxIaCvjH1a1wZK uL7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxDpUF3HMtWErI+dt6me1pX4n3dlLw/lmNWjwtayajBsC25Qtd zG2f/hJNcvq/tv5p7/jgs/I= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b949:: with SMTP id h9mr8215703pls.35.1569883499500; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dtor-ws ([2620:15c:202:201:3adc:b08c:7acc:b325]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y7sm12632755pfn.142.2019.09.30.15.44.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:44:56 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Linus Walleij Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Andrew Lunn , Andrzej Hajda , Bartosz Golaszewski , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Jernej Skrabec , Jonas Karlman , Laurent Pinchart , Neil Armstrong , Russell King , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , ACPI Devel Maling List , netdev Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib Message-ID: <20190930224456.GV237523@dtor-ws> References: <20190911075215.78047-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> <20190917002207.GJ237523@dtor-ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190917002207.GJ237523@dtor-ws> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:22:07PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov > > wrote: > > > > > If we agree in principle, I would like to have the very first 3 patches > > > in an immutable branch off maybe -rc8 so that it can be pulled into > > > individual subsystems so that patches switching various drivers to > > > fwnode_gpiod_get_index() could be applied. > > > > I think it seems a bit enthusiastic to have non-GPIO subsystems > > pick up these changes this close to the merge window so my plan > > is to merge patches 1.2.3 (1 already merged) and then you could > > massage the other subsystems in v5.4-rc1. > > > > But if other subsystems say "hey we want do fix this in like 3 days" > > then I'm game for an immutable branch as well. > > No, if it is still has a chance for -rc1 then I'm good. I was thinking > if it does not go into -rc1 I could convince some of them merge a > targeted immutable branch off -rc8 or 5.3 final and then apply patches > relevant to their subsystems so we do not have to wait till 5.6 to land > everything. So I guess we missed -rc1. Any chance we could get an immutable branch off -rc1 that you will pull into your main branch and I hopefully can persuade other maintainers to pull as well so we do not need to drag it over 2+ merge windows? Thanks. -- Dmitry