Received: by 2002:a25:824b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d11csp7606308ybn; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:05:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy2G9jSk5Pd3bZp3fP3skQwwyXTSN6QjH1tRaIvtweOPQVcjX8FA+KaY+9YYvnRVdyWiFDt X-Received: by 2002:a50:af26:: with SMTP id g35mr23084117edd.129.1569888330149; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:05:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569888330; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TbNz/ZafIcQ22n7yl9R7mGsIfxXRLVeLxqcVFmTwGXNyN3uB92oPPTTRT2Nc/2voQ0 LxkgGM9iaybx8DzeUsl/F1+khN1a6lY0VmuKueyqtU2KbBJLFLgTkRu/4Uaydd4id3cU d7ZbPEv3vZ+tkKbcoTcIpiwAgq+z8CPT16+nfChgSu/iaccvzjOAIkjCeKoU2LC4iC5D AX/e8klFobJOUxUSS1p9FTPXgO6XoL5pC/6ZzUiogx1EJBSL6KkNf/mp66Wok4XWP0iw kvFnfK2ikDQ1PHRJZQOIX527C4m9qpHTyq5yaunU61F44JhhFhvYIb3rInTSwvmF00Za fPEQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=rEsRNcwSfLxyiXEF960aqOSGqTueqbQTN2YJ3y1gIQI=; b=0ZfqSyNdWrJAhUgx0UCL7rMqIbc5FnWhXjTcwJLYtI81bOAeWLE55A6bz+xfjJlTam Tm+Vdnf5PbJNWtOzvtJengX2KL5VFfETTWLOXJ2vm015CjNktVHaQK69ZYTfA8WJStgk P7PFwr6fBMLvoq1wtMO4sVQ709fWWpkz7ZS0pR/tztEcL0JYsLUihyhibBWjhwha1l1p JO4cFzBlQsF1KE2+lpYhgFkSZHGHy6xC5j3Ye8UuEBfbyaejkHlRhtLAiB3gDPo87/RG JW9mVsp7diBBj8m8EMqlKAzefBOW3sYvq5y9D3F1L0LGc/aUrqC4EqUqMgT4PHZJhP9t K+OA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ni5si7877942ejb.184.2019.09.30.17.05.05; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732629AbfJAAC7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:02:59 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:32912 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732622AbfJAAC7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:02:59 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: tonyk) with ESMTPSA id DD23F28A824 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: fill header with kernel-doc To: Bart Van Assche , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, kernel@collabora.com, krisman@collabora.com References: <20190930194846.23141-1-andrealmeid@collabora.com> <845be3ae-f7f4-4e80-ee26-30a03a8af8b4@acm.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Almeida?= Message-ID: <349b7e6a-fcf3-e1f3-2674-50f316bda9bf@collabora.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:01:42 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <845be3ae-f7f4-4e80-ee26-30a03a8af8b4@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/30/19 7:01 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 9/30/19 12:48 PM, André Almeida wrote: >> Insert documentation for structs, enums and functions at header file. >> Format existing and new comments at struct blk_mq_ops as >> kernel-doc comments. > > Hi André, > > Seeing the documentation being improved is great. However, this patch > conflicts with a patch series in my tree and that I plan to post soon. > So I would appreciate it if this patch would be withheld until after my > patch series has been accepted. > Sure, no problem. If it helps the workflow, I could rebase my patch at the top of your tree. > Thanks, > > Bart. >