Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 03:01:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 03:01:35 -0400 Received: from front1.mail.megapathdsl.net ([66.80.60.31]:6416 "EHLO front1.mail.megapathdsl.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 03:01:19 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac11 From: Miles Lane To: Tom Rini Cc: Alan Cox , LKML In-Reply-To: <20011010203004.E11147@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> In-Reply-To: <20011011001617.A4636@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20011010203004.E11147@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99 (Preview Release) Date: 10 Oct 2001 23:52:48 -0700 Message-Id: <1002783189.1357.130.camel@stomata.megapathdsl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 20:30, Tom Rini wrote: > Hello. In updating the PPC defconfigs, I noticed that > drivers/usb/Config.in will ask questions on machines where CONFIG_PCI=n > but CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y. The following puts all of the USB items > under the if [ "$CONFIG_USB" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_USB" = "m" ] check and > fixes some spacing bits. Do we really still think USB deserves the Experimental label? I use it all the time and it seems about as solid as any of the other subsystems. I know drivers continue to evolve, get bugs fixed and new ones get added, but is that a good reason to mark all USB support experimental? Just wondering what the criteria are, Miles - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/