Received: by 2002:a25:824b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d11csp8562954ybn; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:51:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwF+fWWz5aCFm2xIgxoXuxIfP1+6mIBevHPjjvSb4GjCbHfxhI4ldrChEcg0790ZDZmNpqw X-Received: by 2002:a50:ee10:: with SMTP id g16mr26560783eds.267.1569948705512; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 09:51:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569948705; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nCmBa24WrGXDgoVnsEAZXYIp9WLXq29nFh735eOwg882mwNA0D/26+8/ngWn2eFUmi Vo/GIabGv4RIqUE6MzCIipc6aWA31ERJIk513LfglerkNitLVqWZzjGs34KUyaXaYZxJ L/Amae7ewGFaj99E4jp33MrM6a2lL+vXKiSQ0kG/AR+3qPXRXi9NMOIA+dYLtA75Br1L W3lQ2vECgXU361D9E/2uImyLWderPhOMU7gAf6kj5XTXQThSsrPX8GH9UHxnJ9/6+wbq 5ZisgDpCPAGUoAPQZS7rrCoE6st38J0lcsKTxAWbQOUuCXC0sdodS/zeJx/FA+o6vRCP LR4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=4dNPnrd6NQexo4isO87W/pnk33w7/jaRzvSEjgoWqkk=; b=SgX74Qu0QlyWiYJ8K8Q9MsXyYg3zAHjuNdUqUmJtANFfBS2zMoBMK1RP7whcT6nipP y40kqlKK5McKKighKYtYLGKSde/Z0LJ6B3zKkfjXXnFPRLxwMAM3EfSfqJQBPXALsDp2 9LeWyWFbHFMTedW/xuAV0igp+UkJ/N7JYJ3xvjV5b6Hll0uuowvdvsE9uMXF4DYGrgv2 tLIzdJwYRe4eQu5TAU5WfobXkeQxlqVUSm8iNvx3gCVz81QkpzQYnUQvklU2GqYJp/Kl RGUntbCz2LdL9Ma7Oddopo7NwtavyAHrsJ9Tr54fdakpPHz/q6wLeQvq4JqFiMWkkWcU XTZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f17si10008198eda.232.2019.10.01.09.51.20; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 09:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387562AbfJAQ17 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 12:27:59 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51628 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727434AbfJAQ17 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 12:27:59 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E36AF27; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1569947262.2639.15.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 17/22] thunderbolt: Add initial support for USB4 From: Oliver Neukum To: Mika Westerberg , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Anthony Wong , Mario.Limonciello@dell.com, Andreas Noever , Yehezkel Bernat , Michael Jamet , Rajmohan Mani , Nicholas Johnson , Alan Stern , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Lukas Wunner Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 18:27:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20191001150734.GA2714@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20191001113830.13028-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20191001113830.13028-18-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20191001124748.GH2954373@kroah.com> <20191001130905.GO2714@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20191001145354.GA3366714@kroah.com> <20191001150734.GA2714@lahna.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, den 01.10.2019, 18:07 +0300 schrieb Mika Westerberg: Hi, > OK, but does that break existing .configs? I mean if you have already > CONFIG_THUNDERBOLT in your .config/defconfig does it now just get > dropped silently? People will have to look at this new stuff anyway. > For example firewire has CONFIG_FIREWIRE even though the "standard" name > is IEEE 1394. I was thinking maybe we can do the same for > USB4/Thunderbolt USB and Thunderbolt used to be distinct protocols. Whereas Firewire was just a colloquial name for IEEE1394. Please be wordy here. "Unified support for USB4 and Thunderbolt4" Regards Oliver