Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932328AbWACUee (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:34:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932403AbWACUed (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:34:33 -0500 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:144 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932328AbWACUed (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:34:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 15:34:27 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Pete Zaitcev cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net, , , , Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb: replace __setup("nousb") with __module_param_call In-Reply-To: <20060103113533.6ac3e351.zaitcev@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1140 Lines: 29 On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:46:26 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > But even if it does, my patch saved reading, so I think it should be > > > applied as well. > > > > What you mean by "saved reading"? > > The diffstat was almost all dashes: 13 deletions, 1 addition. > > > Btw, do we really need to export "nousb" in sysfs? > > Nobody would die if we didn't, but there's nothing wrong with the idea > in general. At least you'd know that the parameter was actually parsed. > I wish usb-handoff was exported similarly, because there's absolutely > no way to tell if it worked or was quietly ignored. And I abhor printks > in normal or success cases, so I do not want such indication. usb-handoff no longer exists. The kernel now takes USB host controllers away from the BIOS as soon as they are discovered. Alan Stern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/