Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 04:50:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 04:50:03 -0400 Received: from taifun.devconsult.de ([212.15.193.29]:7181 "EHLO taifun.devconsult.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 04:49:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 10:50:16 +0200 From: Andreas Ferber To: Alan Cox Cc: Concerned Programmer , David Woodhouse , Alexander Viro , Keith Owens , "Morgan Collins [Ax0n]" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Tainted Modules Help Notices Message-ID: <20011011105016.C28145@devcon.net> Mail-Followup-To: Alan Cox , Concerned Programmer , David Woodhouse , Alexander Viro , Keith Owens , "Morgan Collins [Ax0n]" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:17:22PM +0100 Organization: dev/consulting GmbH X-NCC-RegID: de.devcon Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:17:22PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Hardly. Its there to handle maintainability issues. Right now its got some > glitches - and the BSD one is a glitch we need to sort out. Clearly BSD > stuff where the source is in the kernel is not harming anyones ability to > deubg. What about simply adding "BSD (included in kernel)" as a possible "untainted" MODULE_LICENSE()? Andreas -- Andreas Ferber - dev/consulting GmbH - Bielefeld, FRG --------------------------------------------------------- +49 521 1365800 - af@devcon.net - www.devcon.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/