Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 04:54:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 04:54:01 -0400 Received: from trantor.dso.org.sg ([192.190.204.1]:24533 "EHLO trantor.dso.org.sg") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 04:53:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 16:56:36 +0800 From: Richard Shih-Ping Chan To: Alan Cox Cc: Richard Chan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: -ac10,-ac11 no boot on SMP PentiumII box Message-ID: <20011011165636.B1174@cshihpin.dso.org.sg> In-Reply-To: <20011011110327.B25934@cshihpin.dso.org.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:08:19AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've narrowed it down to the change between 2.4.10-ac8 and -ac9. Maybe it has something to do with CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE? On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:08:19AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Normally I would expect "Calibrating delay loop..." but no go. > > > > Last -ac kernel tried was 2.4.9-ac10 with success. > > 2.4.10 stock also works. > > > > Has anything affected the CPU startup code? > > Not that I am aware of. There are some locking changes in specific cases > but I tested that still booted on my dual PPro > > Alan -- Richard Chan DSO National Laboratories 20 Science Park Drive Singapore 118230 Tel: 7727045 Fax: 7766476 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/