Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964964AbWACV1H (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:27:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964954AbWACV1A (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:27:00 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:24755 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964953AbWACV06 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:26:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath - PathScale InfiniPath driver From: Arjan van de Ven To: "Bryan O'Sullivan" Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1136323485.10862.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20051230080002.GA7438@kroah.com> <1135984304.13318.50.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> <20051231001051.GB20314@kroah.com> <1135993250.13318.94.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> <20060103172732.GA9170@kroah.com> <1136321691.10862.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1136321851.2869.18.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1136323485.10862.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:26:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1136323614.2869.20.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 725 Lines: 17 > Perhaps read/write on the character device file would be preferable to > ioctls for sending and receiving these management packets? We don't > implement those file methods at the moment, so it's not like we'd be > displacing anything. if it's just data packets.. you could implement a device that offers the SG_IO interface. Yes it's ioctls, but it's a preexisting ABI so I suspect that's not too big a deal (and maybe you can even leverage a lot of existing code for this) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/