Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964809AbWACVdQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:33:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964928AbWACVdQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:33:16 -0500 Received: from mail.cs.unm.edu ([64.106.20.33]:3992 "EHLO mail.cs.unm.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964809AbWACVdN (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:33:13 -0500 From: "Sharma Sushant" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Benchmarks Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:34:31 -0500 Message-Id: <20060103213244.M41864@webmail.cs.unm.edu> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.50 20050106 X-OriginatingIP: 128.165.17.254 (sushant) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 553 Lines: 15 Hello everyone, If someone make some modifications to kernel code and want to know how much overead those modifications has caused, what are the benchmarks that one should use to calculate the overhead of the added code. please cc the reply to me. Thanks a lot. -- Sushant Sharma http://cs.unm.edu/~sushant - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/