Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751488AbWACW3V (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:29:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751448AbWACW3V (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:29:21 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:35815 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751488AbWACW3U (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:29:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 14:29:16 -0800 (PST) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: rddunlap@shark.he.net To: sushant@cs.unm.edu cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Benchmarks Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 732 Lines: 22 | Hello everyone, | If someone make some modifications to kernel code and want to know how much | overead those modifications has caused, what are the benchmarks that one | should use to calculate the overhead of the added code. | please cc the reply to me. | Thanks a lot. There are a lot of benchmarks out there. E.g., some are listed at http://lbs.sourceforge.net/ and http://lse.sourceforge.net/benchmarks/ just depends on what you want/need, like others have said. -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/