Received: by 2002:a25:824b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d11csp1365654ybn; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 15:07:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwEIwgSGMRuAS218y09CHNBaVMD8cODQIpHRothGdrk+BzBq850GADphYqwna19p1UGl6Md X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:90d4:: with SMTP id v20mr5195495ejw.189.1570054040590; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 15:07:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570054040; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jcuKfxuNqF8tVAQOjdFaMHMD/mVCvXIhupiZLZ/Oi9xLx8CVxo7k1LPhWtronWvPl2 ccw2PLdOWGjYg6+O1M6AuyzRKSMEGXCEhO/DDCA9VoX1RrE/NhENq2c4SgPgJgQaCBKF 9Q8NlNFMkh8FBf7QTSOClG/bZGdYQVZ4gsIxRNdFWlyl1j9J/QBgZ0aIv8PkE+OjSPx/ uZjksFeKtIUP2MYkGkZIFGfAkbLUFf93YFwS2JFF2KJOIUBVb7qGUhCwxCI7UNnJos6Q DkKf2sSluvdFeXsECQyZy80DTlhwqopinrsr79ZoiW0++kETJ9gmrZjd7p1+SG9xCfMA bYQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=6Fq7rXlxfKdakgJSZdrWwIhz+F6AJ0GF/D2DxHC+/aE=; b=yIbF8VHlbx5uMK6izkW1lh5jP6UKO8kZDYI5RfA5kkdeJ1EYeg0SNg0txs/JjwjyEE SlMWtLwYhqzptrJ8fs3a88glI8ES6fah4lkEm289AtVXgnKfWb7EdnYuiSjDy797p4GI eevkBImUC0rx7dj2VtNLz6h2IIOmpkN2R83KkVRYXch3fQV1KxoxJMtVxOKLFc3oXdtD vIbxBGCqD0upBNyEzBX2HBRUDCsr25c4/Phk2O4zYrAsAiVjSTKoh6fGVjDq7rJGBiUZ SyDe7XX7AXT8CmHBGXTqQ0jOVGjj6ktD6xcVy9WJoi332qVgoa/nfdXUqHu6Pu+zAksU 5XMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l48si283489edc.276.2019.10.02.15.06.55; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 15:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726961AbfJBWE6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:04:58 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:17044 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726462AbfJBWE5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:04:57 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x92M2JX9083595 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:04:56 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vd1785bp2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:04:56 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 23:04:54 +0100 Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.194) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 2 Oct 2019 23:04:48 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x92M4kCn46792984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:04:46 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6805BA4053; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:04:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9A0A4055; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:04:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dhcp-9-31-103-196.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.31.103.196]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:04:44 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] ima: make process_buffer_measurement() non static From: Mimi Zohar To: Nayna Jain , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Ard Biesheuvel , Jeremy Kerr , Matthew Garret , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Claudio Carvalho , George Wilson , Elaine Palmer , Eric Ricther , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Prakhar Srivastava Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:04:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1569594360-7141-7-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> References: <1569594360-7141-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> <1569594360-7141-7-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19100222-4275-0000-0000-0000036D75ED X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19100222-4276-0000-0000-000038807A43 Message-Id: <1570053883.4421.77.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-02_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=911 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910020175 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Cc'ing Prakhar] On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 10:25 -0400, Nayna Jain wrote: > To add the support for checking against blacklist, it would be needed > to add an additional measurement record that identifies the record > as blacklisted. > > This patch modifies the process_buffer_measurement() and makes it > non static to be used by blacklist functionality. It modifies the > function to handle more than just the KEXEC_CMDLINE. > > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain Making process_buffer_measurement() non static is the end result, not the reason for the change.  The reason for changing process_buffer_measurement() is to make it more generic.  The blacklist measurement record is the usecase. Please rewrite the patch description. thanks, Mimi