Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751675AbWADKzs (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 05:55:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751676AbWADKzs (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 05:55:48 -0500 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:29667 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751669AbWADKzs (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 05:55:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:55:46 +0100 From: Jan Blunck To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Dave Jones , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Eliminate __attribute__ ((packed)) warnings for gcc-4.1 Message-ID: <20060104105546.GA10207@hasse.suse.de> References: <20060103113045.GB24131@hasse.suse.de> <20060104022530.GA29784@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: "From: jblunck@suse.de" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 851 Lines: 25 On Wed, Jan 04, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >What's with the funky placement of ; ? > >The rest of the struct looks sensible. > > > Looks like a simple s/__attribute__((packed))// rather than > s/\s+__attribute__((packed))/; Yeah, seems that I was too lazy. I'll do better next time ;) Andrew, I'll resend a whitespace-beautified version. Regards, Jan -- Jan Blunck jblunck@suse.de SuSE LINUX - A Novell company Maxfeldstr. 5 +49-911-74053-608 D-90409 N?rnberg http://www.suse.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/