Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp683561ybp; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 03:20:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQEpxLna2SeaVS8f/sVkuNR1zr3/0fvE90Z/ZcRxfX+Y06M9okbjNVoY+likOhgGBT+TUF X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3746:: with SMTP id e6mr11334975ejc.238.1570184414194; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 03:20:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570184414; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nALAIP3PBMn0qs49cmU3f9HKLEyH2McBmrNVrdVoQlql3RyAjtk3+O4jF1VaMsdJiR xPaGhwm0SNFBDtHog/7Uh7A63UhH9M3bi0g8zYTBW87Zde+jlejFq3cesJtbjQv+VBaT CixaZucrQv5Yc1cpfRjdu1kYTEkQgk/MsfW+hq84PKM7H/3aY/pL+uAQAx76Tl9RsECP xbmfDv1R2sZFL/5Tdc9OSrrPIoEvVZhyFWHtaz0roc3oBkoSgV0VNBXsYzQwkt2MHi3u ecr/U9hi9JGxXQK7eTrlSpGpE6nzPqjn2Lk/Mpz+Qhnf0et7+5Irhj6efrfQrJojkbuC BUcg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=s8tqsqMy+G0/tcU7luJERjELtm00m1qaFN1WnG1XMF0=; b=abnlKxnq6L/p99YeiUP2kOCllaVVQiGDJTpEMC9xMV2UCHNOkw9cQ9nsJnHNioMvPF RHjxe/dvRlcUttb7wNDcdklpi7UDEJpVDN0crgb6aOFOui+LIQPxepn23p5FWTUc6FbD eCI0lcv0XJalxL3z/u8yVkHPx68K8Tdpl7bdiRzom6O4dSzEpkRMIK6e6vVu7FeWOzpb FBCspfJGOCCVQpGVy/coTkZBc5JuoSHKqT8TmR990ULmep7BfScVeWvvgn4KxoWkRvVh Brc0sOnihyvHLPNNopGfSSjuWsZF0OMW0VXwmlX0XagKZ0ZprpXHZ/PrtcMZcEmman/E Z8nQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Hkj0H1a1; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ck24si2591712ejb.400.2019.10.04.03.19.50; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 03:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Hkj0H1a1; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731265AbfJDJPx (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:15:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:39891 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729874AbfJDJPw (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:15:52 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id v4so3518306pff.6; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 02:15:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=s8tqsqMy+G0/tcU7luJERjELtm00m1qaFN1WnG1XMF0=; b=Hkj0H1a17gfTA4IBRSDEr6jhOfHZKhPzQr7hTppiuNBr3rWcHa/1fVLIkJ7nLgY4MS rpwqpba5HkFXM8g3eza+y2a9Z5Fu8jqQM8g61sED46Fzj8LDnDTTOtLerEFsicimyY9u wtPARiHwWAULUZ0lDo8Ismp0mWIJJD0Z7yKJqRL+4uqQ062DbR9/y+6sQfqTxvaD1/Ps 77pPN3urY0mkMJ0KY4uN63apCjxPV482S+HU7GTuU9JfEPT75wb8JWK8L4yzI3jflByi iPhYVTjwxRUhjQyKDNmCSrhynfidTWyls8p5tlPx4fz+TMCLYc0nH+at53J0y8lQMafG wOVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=s8tqsqMy+G0/tcU7luJERjELtm00m1qaFN1WnG1XMF0=; b=RiZQbDe7xr3Qw5oXxeufNTEbVANIaBJu04wQRgKvhuSji+guu5Tx7p9/HcjovmjvBQ xdIDKCDtYAOropsQwgMcTWyLjTt1TnOCJwR79yKixnkh9XCZJZjj4oyj3ZIBW0TPXMKN 754KF7AnTI4HSK3T7BJWnHtRqR/V3yvRJgTAG3J5ytBs8ZHh8nVGv6WPq8ZurCdsJV+E /+w6R+ZRHY3vYv9SCT5F6t52x/MDyMYgZTnixWZsQtw3Vt2rYPADXjC7cjsXlmmBorth BfJxzghPtVv7WJaDaO3+SvbM9qZq5S6HYRuonO64C6ba63dil287Hltt4FZKS6KKf8mk cfKg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXLvDGWNDpRl1awymimjg23DFKVP0dz228R6cJXGBm3YdA0wAXo /FwpIHesAX9kYfoLktDUPOuSbSUrHj4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e50b:: with SMTP id t11mr15594108pjy.50.1570180551460; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 02:15:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from f1 (ag061063.dynamic.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp. [157.107.61.63]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bb15sm3451428pjb.2.2019.10.04.02.15.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Oct 2019 02:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 18:15:45 +0900 From: Benjamin Poirier To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manish Chopra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/17] staging: qlge: Fix rx stall in case of allocation failures Message-ID: <20191004091545.GA29467@f1> References: <20190927101210.23856-1-bpoirier@suse.com> <20191004081931.GA67764@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191004081931.GA67764@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/10/04 10:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 07:11:54PM +0900, Benjamin Poirier wrote: [...] > > As this code got moved to staging with the goal to drop it from the > tree, why are you working on fixing it up? Do you want it moved back > out of staging into the "real" part of the tree, or are you just fixing > things that you find in order to make it cleaner before we delete it? > > confused, > I expected one of two possible outcomes after moving the qlge driver to staging: 1) it gets the attention of people looking for something to work on and the driver is improved and submitted for normal inclusion in the future 2) it doesn't get enough attention and the driver is removed I don't plan to do further work on it and I'm admittedly not holding my breath for others to rush in but I already had those patches; it wasn't a big effort to submit them as a first step towards outcome #1. If #2 is a foregone conclusion, then there's little point in applying the patches. The only benefit I can think of that if the complete removal is reverted in the future, this specific problem will at least be fixed.