Received: by 2002:a5b:505:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o5csp799179ybp; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 05:15:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxTGtME02ns1xJTnB56eAYARJcKmaK+hylgA0vogRTwhZwdx6WfFZN9aFa60DiqxXztUVQV X-Received: by 2002:a50:f04e:: with SMTP id u14mr14854462edl.247.1570191310605; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:15:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570191310; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eCUdiQvCZBkuK2H5ljcddoFQZ99s2FqrsFdGHLVgyWExrvAsBmGh9LnVOvNoNmsyoE xOSFPfdYdSSV9lkuM3+FIOSuFyeP4bfCKCkhTO+URlpaaTFmOG+kFzGmFFmqlfPG7V44 W0R4az/WSzN/jJY6qe8uaeYzffUJY4naygJwp9LHWuBA7+x3GDYi1MT57L2ctHRXIo// Pbnj/GwPozAkWXh+9y4cJiAsqez6l+UXlQIZFTVrNZnRRLPNldUEBc4XgXci6skyTMzb C5SVORCkjrS8/7ay0R4Jb1YawvuMJaflqPjpvzH7qFBPAQ+TXQ8KSFjVuHtgT8ujjdly z8LA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=hQCTazg1cIJWL5y+7YaLysmUP4CzyBceX1L/LM9b3zg=; b=jo8/C49El2kC9vsuu+mYL1eSf3rI+RD0UGy3Vc/60aTiFRyxYNurJBGrf14OLEPwhA U4ewYFZ2L71wXf76w2m/wW9dPZ4Xy1kLP3MRrcSnDx7uqqtTAvfZ9p3RwmNeQZg0+Kwk vFny/P+++AlwErHp4qGuHNXAk5SKcKhEw/wZyNOx93RvczH/5iLIISSROFaBcuDsqLmO B8HjCJmZ+sF3GQQgu9jOMLZEGVAXJSG7eXe7r1Ga7IJWmCbnNPF/XQ4kOMvv+i8zh6Do lbQCs2LCRn4bNGhQBvlB/FWe8tIeBvpIF3JryJY1ePibxTf9vcBh8T4KcfqheXnENjNL Tl9w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l26si3364517edb.258.2019.10.04.05.14.44; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730566AbfJDMIw (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 08:08:52 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40682 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729189AbfJDMIw (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2019 08:08:52 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691DFAD7B; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 12:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 14:08:49 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Alastair D'Silva Cc: alastair@d-silva.org, Andrew Morton , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , Pavel Tatashin , Dan Williams , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] memory_hotplug: Add a bounds check to __add_pages Message-ID: <20191004120849.GG9578@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20191001004617.7536-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> <20191001004617.7536-2-alastair@au1.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191001004617.7536-2-alastair@au1.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 01-10-19 10:46:15, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > From: Alastair D'Silva > > On PowerPC, the address ranges allocated to OpenCAPI LPC memory > are allocated from firmware. These address ranges may be higher > than what older kernels permit, as we increased the maximum > permissable address in commit 4ffe713b7587 > ("powerpc/mm: Increase the max addressable memory to 2PB"). It is > possible that the addressable range may change again in the > future. > > In this scenario, we end up with a bogus section returned from > __section_nr (see the discussion on the thread "mm: Trigger bug on > if a section is not found in __section_nr"). > > Adding a check here means that we fail early and have an > opportunity to handle the error gracefully, rather than rumbling > on and potentially accessing an incorrect section. > > Further discussion is also on the thread ("powerpc: Perform a bounds > check in arch_add_memory") > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190827052047.31547-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva I am sorry to come late to the party. This looks better. Acked-by: Michal Hocko Thanks! > --- > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > index c73f09913165..5af9f4466ad1 100644 > --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c > +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > @@ -278,6 +278,22 @@ static int check_pfn_span(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, > return 0; > } > > +static int check_hotplug_memory_addressable(unsigned long pfn, > + unsigned long nr_pages) > +{ > + const u64 max_addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn + nr_pages) - 1; > + > + if (max_addr >> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) { > + const u64 max_allowed = (1ull << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS + 1)) - 1; > + WARN(1, > + "Hotplugged memory exceeds maximum addressable address, range=%#llx-%#llx, maximum=%#llx\n", > + (u64)PFN_PHYS(pfn), max_addr, max_allowed); > + return -E2BIG; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > /* > * Reasonably generic function for adding memory. It is > * expected that archs that support memory hotplug will > @@ -291,6 +307,10 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, > unsigned long nr, start_sec, end_sec; > struct vmem_altmap *altmap = restrictions->altmap; > > + err = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(pfn, nr_pages); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > if (altmap) { > /* > * Validate altmap is within bounds of the total request > -- > 2.21.0 -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs